-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Sunset gkr square #313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sunset gkr square #313
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @zhiyong1997, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request deprecates and removes the GKR Square scheme from the project. While the scheme offered performance improvements for 'pow' gates, it introduced substantial memory overhead, which proved to be a critical bottleneck for ZKML applications. The current approach is to sunset this implementation to improve overall memory efficiency, with a commitment to explore and integrate a more optimized version of GKR Square in subsequent development phases.
Highlights
- GKR Square Scheme Sunset: The GKR Square scheme, which previously aimed to improve the performance of 'pow' gates, has been removed from the codebase.
- Memory Optimization Focus: This removal is a strategic decision to alleviate significant memory overhead identified as a major bottleneck for Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning (ZKML) applications.
- Future Reintegration Plans: The team plans to re-evaluate and re-integrate the GKR Square scheme in the future, focusing on a more memory-efficient implementation.
- Codebase Simplification: Associated configurations, benchmark entries, prover/verifier logic, and helper modules specific to GKR Square have been cleaned up or removed, simplifying the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully removes the GKR Square scheme, which was identified as a memory bottleneck. The changes are comprehensive, touching configurations, benchmarks, tests, and the core prover/verifier logic. The removal is clean and also introduces a beneficial memory optimization for the ProverScratchPad. I've identified one critical issue regarding a missing import that would cause a compilation failure, along with a couple of medium-severity refactoring opportunities to simplify the code now that GKRScheme has only one variant.
The GKR Square Scheme improves the performance of pow gate. However, it also introduces additional overhead to the ScratchPad, which we found is a major memory bottleneck for ZKML application. We'll temporarily sunset GKR Square, and find a better way to integrate it in the future.