-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Update to newest non v1 of embedded-hal #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
RandomInsano
merged 3 commits into
RandomInsano:master
from
stargazing-dino:update-to-newest-non-v1
Jul 17, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My plan here is to eventually have
embedded-hal-02andembedded-hal-1and support both traits from this libraryThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's fine to just support whatever is newest. Nothing is dependent. Is there going to be added complexity supporting both?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It'd make it much easier for me to support just v1. Supporting both is possible (it's even done in the embassy-rs crate itself) but it's a hassle for sure. I think I'd end up adding feature flags to support both.
I only intend to use v1 but I'll leave this up to you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, just keep it at v1 and we'll cross that bridge when we get there.
I'm a little concerned this bump will break the Embedded Linux HAL as all of the examples target the Raspberry Pi
c901cc6
Do you know if this breaks anything there? Could you go and add
cargo checkto the CI process and then rebase this on top of that? At least then I don't have to question if this stuff compiles.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
v1 should be fine as linux-embedded-hal's newest version is 0.4.0 and it looks like they target v1 as well.
@RandomInsano Do you mind merging #24 and I can rebase this PR on it? That PR has a check to ensure that I don't regress linux builds