Skip to content

Conversation

@milanmlft
Copy link
Member

I was getting some errors for ruff in my IDE (Zed), fixed by upgrading to anything newer than 0.11:

2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 WARN  [project::lsp_store] Get code actions
via ruff failed: failed to deserialize diagnostic data: missing field
`kind`
2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 ERROR [project.format.local.code-actions]
Failed to resolve code action
CodeActionKind("source.organizeImports.ruff") with language server ruff
2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 WARN  [project.format.local.code-actions] No
code actions were resolved, continuing

I was getting some errors for ruff in my IDE (Zed), fixed by upgrading
to anything newer than `0.11`:

```
2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 WARN  [project::lsp_store] Get code actions
via ruff failed: failed to deserialize diagnostic data: missing field
`kind`
2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 ERROR [project.format.local.code-actions]
Failed to resolve code action
CodeActionKind("source.organizeImports.ruff") with language server ruff
2025-12-23T11:32:20+01:00 WARN  [project.format.local.code-actions] No
code actions were resolved, continuing
```
@milanmlft milanmlft requested a review from stefpiatek December 23, 2025 11:10
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.75%. Comparing base (42284de) to head (bd6cf88).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #617   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.75%   87.75%           
=======================================
  Files          76       76           
  Lines        3577     3577           
=======================================
  Hits         3139     3139           
  Misses        438      438           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@milanmlft
Copy link
Member Author

milanmlft commented Dec 23, 2025

Not sure why so many changes in uv.lock. I just ran

uv add --dev "ruff>=0.11" --upgrade-package ruff

(fwiw, I don't think we should hard pin dev dependencies)

@milanmlft milanmlft merged commit b275a8b into main Dec 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@milanmlft milanmlft deleted the milanmlft/bump-ruff-version branch December 23, 2025 12:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants