feat: remove make-range, support quantified captures

[AbaoFromCUG]

Fix #43

Refer to nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjects#612

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR modernizes TreeSitter query files by removing deprecated make-range! directives and adopting quantified captures, a feature supported in newer versions of nvim-treesitter-textobjects (as referenced in PR #612). The changes simplify query patterns by using native TreeSitter quantifiers (+, *) instead of manually constructing ranges.

Key changes:

• Replaced make-range! directive patterns with quantified capture syntax (+ and * quantifiers)
• Simplified query patterns by directly capturing node sequences instead of defining start/end ranges
• Updated example file by removing cell separator comments

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.

File	Description
res/queries/python/textobjects/cellcontent.scm	Converted from make-range! to quantified captures using (_)+ and _+ patterns for matching cell content
res/queries/python/textobjects/cell.scm	Converted from make-range! to quantified captures, including restructured patterns for cells between separators
example/main.ju.py	Removed Jupyter cell separator comments and content, simplifying the example file

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Similar to the "cell between two separator" pattern, this pattern applies #match-cell-content? to @_cellcontent which uses the * quantifier and could match zero nodes. The predicate should likely be applied to @cell or the pattern needs adjustment to ensure content nodes exist. Also, the extra parentheses grouping on lines 35-41 is inconsistent with other patterns in the file and may not be necessary.

[Copilot]

The file now starts with an unnecessary blank line. For consistency with other query files in the codebase, this blank line should be removed.

[Copilot]

Inconsistent wildcard quantifier syntax: This pattern uses _+ while other patterns in the file use (_)+. In TreeSitter query syntax, _ is a wildcard that matches any single node, and quantifiers should be applied to parenthesized expressions. The correct syntax should be (_)+ to match one or more nodes of any type, consistent with lines 7 and 26.

[Copilot]

Inconsistent wildcard quantifier syntax: This pattern uses _+ while other patterns in the file use (_)+. In TreeSitter query syntax, _ is a wildcard that matches any single node, and quantifiers should be applied to parenthesized expressions. The correct syntax should be (_)+ to match one or more nodes of any type, consistent with lines 7 and 26.

[Copilot]

Inconsistent wildcard quantifier syntax: This pattern uses _+ while line 8 uses (_)+. In TreeSitter query syntax, _ is a wildcard that matches any single node, and quantifiers should be applied to parenthesized expressions. The correct syntax should be (_)+ to match one or more nodes of any type, consistent with line 8.

Suggested change

	_+ @cell
	(_)+ @cell

[Copilot]

The indentation in this query pattern is inconsistent with the rest of the file. Lines 25-29 use 4 spaces of indentation, while other patterns in the file (lines 6-11, 14-21, 34-42) use 2 spaces. This should be adjusted to 2 spaces for consistency.

Suggested change

	(comment) @_cellseparator @cell
	(_)* @_cellcontent @cell
	(comment) @_cellseparator
	(#match-cell-content? @_cellcontent)
	(#match-percent-separator? @_cellseparator)
	(comment) @_cellseparator @cell
	(_)* @_cellcontent @cell
	(comment) @_cellseparator
	(#match-cell-content? @_cellcontent)
	(#match-percent-separator? @_cellseparator)

[Copilot]

The pattern change appears to alter the semantic meaning. Previously, this pattern matched the separator followed by content nodes, creating a range from the separator to the last content node. Now, it captures both the separator and content nodes together as @cell. However, the predicate #match-cell-content? is still applied to @_cellcontent instead of @cell, which may not work as intended since @_cellcontent uses the * quantifier and could match zero nodes. Consider whether the predicate should be applied to @cell or if the pattern needs adjustment.