fix: explicitly load docparams pylint plugin in .pylintrc

[tk-woven]

Description

This is toward unblocking #101 which is stuck on a pylint configuration issue. We provide some configuration in .pylintrc that seems to expect the check_docs plugin, but the new plugin is docparams. We therefore explicitly load the docparams plugin when running pylint.

Reproduction

Before this change, run

pylint setup.py

in the root of the repo, and you'll see

root@hostname:/home/dgp# pylint setup.py
************* Module /home/dgp/.pylintrc
.pylintrc:1: [E0015(unrecognized-option), ] Unrecognized option found: accept-no-param-doc, accept-no-return-doc, accept-no-yields-doc

After this change, the above example runs without errors.

---

This change is 

[kuanleetri]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @chrisochoatri and @tk-woven)

---

.pylintrc line 3 at r1 (raw file):

# Copyright 2019-2020 Toyota Research Institute.  All rights reserved.
[MAIN]
load-plugins=pylint.extensions.docparams

Can we involve all the criteria under [MASTER]?

[tk-woven]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @chrisochoatri and @kuanleetri)

---

.pylintrc line 3 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, kuanleetri (Kuan-Hui Lee) wrote…

Can we involve all the criteria under [MASTER]?

Unfortunately I don't think we can. The pylint docs ask us to use MAIN. I just tried putting this in MASTER locally, but then the unrecognized-option error is raised again.

[wadimkehl]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @chrisochoatri and @kuanleetri)

---

.pylintrc line 3 at r1 (raw file):

Can we involve all the criteria under [MASTER]?
SGTM

[tk-woven]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @chrisochoatri and @kuanleetri)

---

.pylintrc line 3 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, wadimkehl (Wadim Kehl) wrote…

Can we involve all the criteria under [MASTER]?
SGTM

After discussing review criteria with Kuan in a Slack DM, I'll dismiss this comment and proceed to merge to unblock the MRs stuck on this. As noted, I tested the recommendation for MASTER and had no luck unfortunately, but following the instruction of the docs I linked to did the trick.

Investigated suggestion but it unfortuantely did not fix the problem; need to merge this to unblock other MRs.

[nehalmamgain]

Thanks so much Tyler, much appreciated!