-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
get a finish branch command #4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new "finish branch" feature was integrated into the command-line tool. This includes updates to the argument parsing to recognize a new subcommand, the implementation of Git workflow logic for finalizing feature branches, and the main command dispatch to invoke the new functionality. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI_Main
participant ArgsParser
participant GitModule
User->>CLI_Main: Run with "finbr" subcommand
CLI_Main->>ArgsParser: Parse arguments
ArgsParser-->>CLI_Main: InspectionCommand::FinishBranch
CLI_Main->>GitModule: finish_branch()
GitModule->>GitModule: Open repo, detect current & main branch
GitModule->>GitModule: Checkout main, fetch & pull, prompt for deletion
GitModule-->>CLI_Main: Result (success or error)
CLI_Main-->>User: Output result or error
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces a new "finish branch" command to streamline finishing a feature branch workflow by detecting the main branch, switching to it, updating it with the latest changes, and optionally deleting the feature branch.
- Added a new git module with finish_branch functionality.
- Integrated the new FinishBranch command into the main command dispatch.
- Updated argument parsing and Cargo.toml to include the git2 dependency.
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/main.rs | Added FinishBranch command handling in the main fn. |
| src/git.rs | Introduced finish_branch logic along with helper git operations. |
| src/args.rs | Added the FinishBranch subcommand and its argument parsing. |
| Cargo.toml | Added the git2 crate dependency to support git operations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/git.rs (2)
55-80: Enhance main branch detection logic.The current logic is functional but could be more robust:
- Remote branch detection: The logic checks for remote branches but doesn't create local tracking branches
- No fallback: If neither main nor master exists, it fails without guidance
Consider improving the detection with better error messages:
// Try to find remote main/master branches let branches = repo.branches(Some(BranchType::Remote))?; for branch_result in branches { let (branch, _) = branch_result?; if let Some(name) = branch.name()? { if name.ends_with("/main") { + // Could create local tracking branch here if needed return Ok("main".to_string()); } else if name.ends_with("/master") { return Ok("master".to_string()); } } } - Err("Could not detect main or master branch".into()) + Err("Could not detect main or master branch. Please ensure you have a 'main' or 'master' branch locally or on the 'origin' remote.".into())
1-4: Consider consistency in Git operations approach.The module imports both
git2crate andstd::process::Commandfor Git operations. While this works, consider whether to standardize on one approach for better maintainability.If possible, prefer using the
git2crate for all Git operations to maintain consistency and avoid external command dependencies.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Cargo.toml(1 hunks)src/args.rs(2 hunks)src/git.rs(1 hunks)src/main.rs(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/main.rs (1)
src/git.rs (1)
finish_branch(8-53)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/main.rs (2)
3-3: LGTM: Clean module import.The git module import is properly placed with other module declarations.
119-124: LGTM: Proper command handling and error management.The FinishBranch command implementation follows the established pattern with appropriate error handling using eprintln! and process::exit(1).
src/args.rs (2)
20-20: LGTM: Consistent enum variant addition.The FinishBranch variant follows the established naming pattern and structure.
83-87: LGTM: Well-structured command definition.The InspectForFinishBranch struct is properly documented and follows the same pattern as other commands. The "finbr" command name is concise and appropriate.
src/git.rs (2)
115-124: LGTM: Clean branch checkout implementation.The checkout_branch function properly uses the git2 crate for branch operations and follows Git best practices.
126-130: LGTM: Simple and correct branch deletion.The delete_branch function is straightforward and correctly uses the git2 crate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.md(1 hunks)src/args.rs(3 hunks)src/show_file_size.rs(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/args.rs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/show_file_size.rs (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import addition is necessary.The
std::path::Pathimport is correctly added to support the new extension matching functionality.
11-23: LGTM: Well-implemented extension matching logic.The
matches_extensionclosure is well-designed:
- Properly handles optional extension filtering
- Case-insensitive comparison improves UX
- Correctly returns
falsefor files without extensions when filter is specified- Uses
to_string_lossy()to handle potential non-UTF8 filenames
27-27: LGTM: Improved memory usage by using references.Using
&options.baseinstead of moving the value is a good improvement that avoids unnecessary ownership transfer.Also applies to: 52-52
gpt helped most of the code.
Summary by CodeRabbit