Skip to content

Conversation

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Contributor

Also: change vite target as part of migrating to 7.x.

Also: change vite target as part of migrating to 7.x.
@jbergstroem jbergstroem requested a review from a team November 24, 2025 12:43
@jbergstroem jbergstroem merged commit 72c341d into main Nov 24, 2025
4 checks passed
@jbergstroem jbergstroem deleted the chore/deps-251124 branch November 24, 2025 12:44
"author": "Topsort",
"packageManager": "pnpm@9.0.6",
"packageManager": "pnpm@10.23.0",
"repository": {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: package.json Node.js engine requirement is too broad, allowing versions incompatible with vite@7.2.4 to be used, causing runtime failures.
Severity: CRITICAL | Confidence: High

🔍 Detailed Analysis

The package.json specifies node: ">=20.0.0", but the vite@7.2.4 dependency requires node: "^20.19.0 || >=22.12.0". This mismatch allows Node.js versions 20.0.0 through 20.18.x to satisfy the project's declared requirement but not Vite's actual minimum. This will lead to runtime failures when executing Vite commands for users or CI/CD systems operating on these specific Node.js versions.

💡 Suggested Fix

Update engines.node in package.json to "node": ">=20.19.0 || >=22.12.0" to accurately reflect vite@7.2.4's minimum Node.js requirements.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: package.json#L9

Potential issue: The `package.json` specifies `node: ">=20.0.0"`, but the `vite@7.2.4`
dependency requires `node: "^20.19.0 || >=22.12.0"`. This mismatch allows Node.js
versions 20.0.0 through 20.18.x to satisfy the project's declared requirement but not
Vite's actual minimum. This will lead to runtime failures when executing Vite commands
for users or CI/CD systems operating on these specific Node.js versions.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 3162237

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants