Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Binary file added jb/_build/.doctrees/flat-tax.doctree
Binary file not shown.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions jb/_build/.doctrees/glue_cache.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{}
Binary file added jb/_build/.doctrees/index.doctree
Binary file not shown.
100,061 changes: 100,061 additions & 0 deletions jb/_build/jupyter_execute/flat-tax.ipynb

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

455 changes: 455 additions & 0 deletions jb/_build/jupyter_execute/flat-tax.py

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions jb/_config.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,3 +22,6 @@ sphinx:
config:
html_js_files:
- https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/require.js/2.3.4/require.min.js

execute:
execute_notebooks: 'off'
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions jb/_toc.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,3 +4,5 @@
# And put the UBI Center homepage at the bottom.
- url: https://ubicenter.org
title: UBI Center home
# Add working UK flat tax UBI notebook
- file: flat-tax
100,062 changes: 100,062 additions & 0 deletions jb/flat-tax.ipynb

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

40 changes: 40 additions & 0 deletions other_simulations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# Compass Report

Title: Basic Income for All: From Desirability to Feasibility ([link](https://www.compassonline.org.uk/publications/basic-income-for-all-from-desirability-to-feasibility/))

Authors: Stewart Lansley and Howard Reed

## Modelling

Two schemes for implementing UBI were modelled, a fast track and slow track route. Modelling was carried out using the Landman Economics Tax-Tranfer Model, using data from the Family Resources Survey to model direct taxes and benefits and the Living Costs and Food survey to model indirect taxes and benefits.

## Schemes

Model 1 is a fast track route for establishing UBI to residents at a basic rate (weekly rates of £40 to children, £60 to adults, £175 to pensioners, total annual cost £28bn). Model 2 is a long-term scheme aimed at improving funding and basic income rates by building a targeted citizens' wealth fund (funded by borrowing, revenue-generating public assets and wealth taxation to the amount of £650bn, able to fund higher weekly rates, with gains mostly going to working-age adults, which increase by £20 per week). The fund is expected to be able to be usable by year 20.

## Benefit changes

For means tested benefits, basic income above £25 is counted and therefore reduces payment levels. Child benefit and the state pension are abolished and replaced with the UBI, though both at the basic level are increased in this scheme.

## Tax changes

The personal tax allowance is abolished and this portion of income is taxed at the basic rate. The next £11,850 is taxed at 15p to reduce the low-income loser count. All other income tax rates are raised by 3p. National Insurance contributions are converted to a flat tax of 12%.

## Long-term phasing

Model 1 is intended for the short term, Model 2 for the long term. Model 2 pays slightly higher weekly rates, made possible by the dividends from the proposed citizens' wealth fund. It is proposed that Model 1 is implemented in one Parliament, and transitions to the more sustainable Model 2 by year 20.

## Treatment of children

The child benefit is removed (currently £21.05 for the eldest and £13.95 for additional children, per week), but increased with a UBI replacement of £40 per week in Model 1 and further increased to £50 per week in Model 2.

## Results

The results find that:

- Child poverty falls from 28.7% to 18.1%
- Working-age poverty falls from approx. 20% to 15.7%
- Pensioner poverty falls from approx. 15% to 11.3%
- The Gini coefficient falls from 0.377 to 0.337
- 75% of households gain and 25% lose income (7% lose more than 5% of income)
- In general, the number of losers among the poorest deciles is very small (0.8%, 3.1% for the 1st and 2nd deciles respectively), and most low deciles make large gains, while deciles 4-8 make small gains and the top decile makes slight losses.