fix(spec): remove built spec, use source directly #641
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for webmonetization-preview ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
sidvishnoi
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of having a pre-built spec in repo (that has to be built on each change to spec and sent along with the PR along with original ReSpec source), use ReSpec source spec directly.
In future, we'll use
w3c/spec-prodto auto-build spec, but from now on, PRs will have to only modify the source document. See #585.cc: @asurkov @lukewarlow
This PR is
mv specification-respec.html index.htmland then just added publishDate same as last build-time.