[improve] replace jcip annotations to jsr305 annotations

[sindhushreem25]

Removal of jcip and moving to spotbugs and javax annotations.

Fixes #xyz

Main Issue: #xyz

PIP: #xyz

Motivation

Modifications

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

[github-actions]

@sindhushreem25 Please add the following content to your PR description and select a checkbox:

- [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes -->
- [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update later -->
- [ ] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
- [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->

[lhotari]

I checked once more and noticed that spotbugs-annotations doesn't contain the annotations. This is what spotbugs-annotations depends on:

    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
      <version>3.0.2</version>
      <scope>compile</scope>
    </dependency>

Please switch to use this dependency directly.

Since javax.annotation is already relocated, there's no need to add entries for that part.

[sindhushreem25]

resolved the comments

[lhotari]

LGTM