Skip to content

Comments

Add hostId attribute to designators#603

Merged
kooomix merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sss
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

Add hostId attribute to designators#603
kooomix merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sss

Conversation

@kooomix
Copy link
Contributor

@kooomix kooomix commented Feb 2, 2026

Introduce a new constant, AttributeHostId, in the designators.go file to represent the host ID. This addition enhances the existing set of attributes for better identification and tracking of hosts in the system.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added new internal identifier constant to support host attribute management.

Introduce a new constant, AttributeHostId, in the designators.go file to represent the host ID. This addition enhances the existing set of attributes for better identification and tracking of hosts in the system.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new public constant AttributeHostId with value "hostId" was added to the identifiers package. This constant is intended for use as an attribute designator to identify host-related entities within the application.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Attribute Identifiers
identifiers/designators.go
Added public constant AttributeHostId to the Attribute constants block.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A constant so small, yet it helps us all,
AttributeHostId answers the call,
With just one line of code so clean,
The cleanest addition we've ever seen! ✨

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch sss

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@kooomix kooomix merged commit 8d968c0 into main Feb 2, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant