Skip to content

Conversation

@paolopas
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

I was snooping around and found this problem on operator+, but it must not be used much otherwise it would have come up before.

Types of changes

What types of changes does this code introduce?

  • [x ] Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I searched the discussions
  • I searched the closed and open issues
  • I read the contribution guidelines
  • I added myself to the copyright attributions for significant changes
  • I checked that tests pass locally with my changes
  • I added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Further comments

I spent more time reading this form than the source header

@grafikrobot grafikrobot added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 26, 2025
@grafikrobot grafikrobot moved this to 🏗 In progress in BFG Tasks Dec 26, 2025
@grafikrobot grafikrobot merged commit ce5309a into bfgroup:main Dec 27, 2025
109 of 110 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in BFG Tasks Dec 27, 2025
@paolopas paolopas deleted the bindflaw branch December 27, 2025 05:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants