Align completed download folder mounts from download clients#6
Open
sethetter wants to merge 1 commit intobrewpirate:mainfrom
Open
Align completed download folder mounts from download clients#6sethetter wants to merge 1 commit intobrewpirate:mainfrom
sethetter wants to merge 1 commit intobrewpirate:mainfrom
Conversation
… Sonarr Likely need to do this with other services, but starting here to validate and get feedback on the approach.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To avoid having to configure a remote path mapping in arr services like Sonarr (is there a name for this category of services in the stack? Radarr, Sonarr, etc?), this PR is mounting the completed download folders in the download clients to the same folders in Sonarr, etc.
The goal is to simplify and reduce the amount of custom configuration in services beyond docker-compose configs.
@brewpirate thoughts? Any issues with this approach, or should I apply this pattern to the rest of the clients/services?