test: comprehensive Soroban authorization tests for ContractProvider by dannyy2000 · Pull Request #36 · bridgelet-org/bridgelet-sdk

dannyy2000 · 2026-01-30T00:10:26Z

Implement complete test suite for smart-contract-based authorization of sweep operations using Stellar Soroban, addressing all critical gaps in RPC integration, contract simulation, and cryptographic logic.

Changes:

Rewrote contract.provider.spec.ts (74 → 1,150+ lines)
Added 78 comprehensive tests (from 3 basic tests)
Organized into 13 test suites covering all functionality
Created jest.config.cjs for proper TypeScript/ESM configuration
Removed duplicate jest config from package.json

Test Coverage:

Statements: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement)
Branches: 87.5% (exceeds ≥85% requirement)
Functions: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement)
Lines: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement)

Key Features:

Configuration & Initialization (6 tests)
- Network passphrase validation (TESTNET/PUBLIC)
- Missing config error handling
- Contract ID and RPC URL validation
Soroban RPC Integration (8 tests)
- Network failures (ECONNREFUSED, ETIMEDOUT, ENOTFOUND)
- TLS/SSL errors, rate limiting (429)
- Malformed responses, account errors
Contract Simulation (7 tests)
- Successful simulation validation
- All major error types (contract not found, invalid function, etc.)
- Proper rpc.Api.isSimulationError detection
- Timeout and resource limit handling
Transaction Building (5 tests)
- TransactionBuilder chaining
- Operation addition and timeout configuration
- Fee and network passphrase correctness
- Build failure scenarios
Authorization Signature Generation (6 tests)
- MVP: 64-byte dummy signatures
- Deterministic output validation
- Production requirements documented (Ed25519, replay protection)
- Security warnings for cryptographic operations
Address Conversion (4 tests)
- Stellar G-address validation
- Contract C-address support
- ScVal conversion and error handling
Error Handling (4 tests)
- InternalServerErrorException wrapping
- Original error message preservation
- Network-specific error handling
Type Safety (6 tests)
- 100% type-safe code
- All mocks properly typed with interfaces
- Zero untyped parameters

Issues Resolved:

Removed invalid verifyAuthorization tests (method doesn't exist)
Documented generateAuthHash as unused and cryptographically weak
Separated MVP vs production behavior with clear documentation
Added security warnings for cryptographic placeholders

Mocking Strategy:

Module-level mocking for @stellar/stellar-sdk
Type-safe mocks for rpc.Server, Contract, TransactionBuilder
Support for async failures and Soroban-specific errors
Method chaining support for builder patterns

Security Documentation:

MVP signatures are NOT production-ready
Requires Ed25519 implementation before production
Replay attack protection needed (timestamp/nonce)
HSM key management recommended
Transaction submission currently simulated only

All acceptance criteria met:
✅ All tests pass (78/78)
✅ ≥85% coverage achieved
✅ Soroban RPC interactions fully tested
✅ Contract call construction validated
✅ Authorization signature logic tested
✅ Config and network handling covered
✅ Error handling for Soroban failures verified
✅ Address conversion tested
✅ MVP vs production behavior documented
✅ Security implications explicitly validated
✅ Every line of code is type-safe

Closes #33

Implement complete test suite for smart-contract-based authorization of sweep operations using Stellar Soroban, addressing all critical gaps in RPC integration, contract simulation, and cryptographic logic. Changes: - Rewrote contract.provider.spec.ts (74 → 1,150+ lines) - Added 78 comprehensive tests (from 3 basic tests) - Organized into 13 test suites covering all functionality - Created jest.config.cjs for proper TypeScript/ESM configuration - Removed duplicate jest config from package.json Test Coverage: - Statements: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement) - Branches: 87.5% (exceeds ≥85% requirement) - Functions: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement) - Lines: 100% (exceeds ≥85% requirement) Key Features: 1. Configuration & Initialization (6 tests) - Network passphrase validation (TESTNET/PUBLIC) - Missing config error handling - Contract ID and RPC URL validation 2. Soroban RPC Integration (8 tests) - Network failures (ECONNREFUSED, ETIMEDOUT, ENOTFOUND) - TLS/SSL errors, rate limiting (429) - Malformed responses, account errors 3. Contract Simulation (7 tests) - Successful simulation validation - All major error types (contract not found, invalid function, etc.) - Proper rpc.Api.isSimulationError detection - Timeout and resource limit handling 4. Transaction Building (5 tests) - TransactionBuilder chaining - Operation addition and timeout configuration - Fee and network passphrase correctness - Build failure scenarios 5. Authorization Signature Generation (6 tests) - MVP: 64-byte dummy signatures - Deterministic output validation - Production requirements documented (Ed25519, replay protection) - Security warnings for cryptographic operations 6. Address Conversion (4 tests) - Stellar G-address validation - Contract C-address support - ScVal conversion and error handling 7. Error Handling (4 tests) - InternalServerErrorException wrapping - Original error message preservation - Network-specific error handling 8. Type Safety (6 tests) - 100% type-safe code - All mocks properly typed with interfaces - Zero untyped parameters Issues Resolved: - Removed invalid verifyAuthorization tests (method doesn't exist) - Documented generateAuthHash as unused and cryptographically weak - Separated MVP vs production behavior with clear documentation - Added security warnings for cryptographic placeholders Mocking Strategy: - Module-level mocking for @stellar/stellar-sdk - Type-safe mocks for rpc.Server, Contract, TransactionBuilder - Support for async failures and Soroban-specific errors - Method chaining support for builder patterns Security Documentation: - MVP signatures are NOT production-ready - Requires Ed25519 implementation before production - Replay attack protection needed (timestamp/nonce) - HSM key management recommended - Transaction submission currently simulated only All acceptance criteria met: ✅ All tests pass (78/78) ✅ ≥85% coverage achieved ✅ Soroban RPC interactions fully tested ✅ Contract call construction validated ✅ Authorization signature logic tested ✅ Config and network handling covered ✅ Error handling for Soroban failures verified ✅ Address conversion tested ✅ MVP vs production behavior documented ✅ Security implications explicitly validated ✅ Every line of code is type-safe Closes bridgelet-org#33

dannyy2000 · 2026-01-30T00:15:02Z

Hi @phertyameen ,I’ve opened this PR for your review.Please let me know if you have any feedback or requested changes I’ll be happy to address them promptly. Thanks!

phertyameen

This is alot I know!. These are some of the highlighted imconpletitions spoted. Please look into it and the entire tests overall.

phertyameen · 2026-01-30T13:43:27Z

src/modules/sweeps/providers/contract.provider.spec.ts

+  });
+
+  /**
+   * SECTION 8: Authorization Signature Generation Tests


CRITICAL - Security Gaps

Tests verify 64-byte length but NOT cryptographic validity

No verification that signature can be validated by contract

Missing test vectors or reference implementation validation

phertyameen · 2026-01-30T13:45:12Z

src/modules/sweeps/providers/contract.provider.spec.ts

+   * NOTE: This method exists but is not used anywhere in the code
+   * Decision needed: Remove it or integrate it into the authorization flow
+   */
+  describe('generateAuthHash - Unused Method', () => {


CRITICAL - Security Gaps

Method exists but unused - security risk

Tests document it's NOT cryptographically safe

Needs decision: remove or implement properlyNeeds decision: remove or implement properly. preferably the later

phertyameen · 2026-01-30T13:50:22Z

src/modules/sweeps/providers/contract.provider.spec.ts

+  };
+});
+
+import {


Move this import together with the imports above. (line 7)

- Add cryptographic validity tests for signature generation (Section 8) - Verify Stellar SDK hash() function usage - Add contract verification simulation tests - Add test vectors for reference implementation - Add collision resistance tests - Implement generateAuthHash with proper cryptography (Section 12) - Replace insecure character code multiplication with SHA-256 - Add timestamp parameter for replay protection - Integrate into authorizeSweep() return value - Add comprehensive cryptographic security tests - Reorganize imports to top of file Closes bridgelet-org#33

dannyy2000 · 2026-01-30T15:07:05Z

@phertyameen all changes have been implemented, Please let me know if you have any feedback or any additional changes, Thanks

phertyameen requested changes Jan 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

phertyameen merged commit d830eca into bridgelet-org:main Jan 30, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Comments

test: comprehensive Soroban authorization tests for ContractProvider#36

test: comprehensive Soroban authorization tests for ContractProvider#36
phertyameen merged 2 commits intobridgelet-org:mainfrom
dannyy2000:test/issue-33-soroban-contractprovider-auth

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

phertyameen left a comment

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Comments

Conversation

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

phertyameen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

phertyameen Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dannyy2000 commented Jan 30, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants