Skip to content

Conversation

@tianzhou
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 24, 2025 09:52
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds the third installment in the Postgres MCP Server Review series, focusing on DBHub - a minimal, vendor-neutral database MCP server. The review is written from the maintainers' perspective, providing an in-depth analysis of DBHub's design decisions, trade-offs, and positioning relative to other solutions.

Key Changes:

  • Adds comprehensive DBHub review article covering installation, tools, token efficiency, guardrails, and design philosophy
  • Updates blog navigation to include the new DBHub review as the first entry in chronological sequence
  • Updates cross-references in previous review articles to link to the new DBHub review

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/docs.json Adds the new DBHub review to the Blog tab navigation, positioned first in the list to maintain reverse chronological order
docs/blog/postgres-mcp-server-review-dbhub.mdx New comprehensive review article explaining DBHub's minimal design approach, token efficiency focus, multi-database support, and vendor-neutral positioning
docs/blog/postgres-mcp-server-review-supabase-mcp.mdx Updates the series list at the end to replace "More reviews coming soon..." with a link to the new DBHub review
docs/blog/postgres-mcp-server-review-mcp-toolbox.mdx Updates the series list at the end to replace "More reviews coming soon..." with a link to the new DBHub review

@tianzhou tianzhou merged commit 5965b7d into main Dec 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@tianzhou tianzhou deleted the dbhub-review branch December 24, 2025 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants