-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
fixed password import issue #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Controller
participant MemberService
participant Database
Controller->>MemberService: getUserByEmail(email)
MemberService->>Database: Query user by email (select password from credential accounts)
Database-->>MemberService: User data (with credential account passwords)
MemberService-->>Controller: User data or error
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm error Exit handler never called! Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/controllers/member.controller.ts (2)
10-16: Critical security issue: Authentication bypass.The controller extracts
passwordfrom query parameters but no longer uses it for verification. This means any request with just a valid email address will succeed, completely bypassing authentication.The error message "Incorrect email or password" is also misleading since password verification was removed. Either:
- Restore password verification:
const user = await memberService.getUserByEmail(email as string); + + // Add password verification logic here + const isValidPassword = await bcrypt.compare(password as string, user.accounts[0]?.password); + if (!isValidPassword) throw new ApiError('Incorrect email or password', 400);
- Or clarify this endpoint's purpose and update the error message:
- if(!user) throw new ApiError('Incorrect email or password', 400); + if(!user) throw new ApiError('User not found', 404);
10-10: Remove unused password parameter.The
passwordis extracted from query parameters but never used. This could confuse API consumers who might expect authentication.- const {email, password} = req.query; + const {email} = req.query;Or implement proper password verification if this endpoint should authenticate users.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/controllers/member.controller.ts(1 hunks)src/services/member.service.ts(2 hunks)
|
|
||
| const {email, password} = req.query; | ||
|
|
||
| if(email && password) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update condition check for consistency.
Since password verification was removed, the condition should only check for email presence.
- if(email && password) {
+ if(email) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if(email && password) { | |
| if (email) { |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/controllers/member.controller.ts at line 12, update the condition to
check only for the presence of email, removing the password check since password
verification was removed. Change the if statement to verify just the email
variable.
| import { ApiError } from "../utils/apiError"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const getUserByEmail = async(email: string, hashedPassword: string) => { | ||
| export const getUserByEmail = async(email: string) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Function behavior changed significantly - consider renaming.
The function signature change removes password verification entirely, changing this from an authentication function to a simple user retrieval function. The current name getUserByEmail doesn't indicate that it now returns password data without verification.
Consider renaming to something like getUserWithCredentialsByEmail to better reflect its current purpose, or create separate functions for authentication vs. user retrieval.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/services/member.service.ts at line 4, the function getUserByEmail no
longer performs password verification and now returns user data including
password information. Rename this function to something more descriptive like
getUserWithCredentialsByEmail to clearly indicate it returns sensitive
credential data without authentication. Alternatively, split the functionality
into two separate functions: one for user retrieval without credentials and
another for authentication with password verification.
| select: { | ||
| password: true | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security concern: Password data exposure without verification.
The query now selects and returns password data without any verification. This means any caller can retrieve password hashes by just providing an email address.
If this function is intended for authentication, you need to add password verification logic. If it's for user retrieval only, consider whether exposing password data is necessary:
select: {
- password: true
+ // Remove password if not needed for authentication
+ id: true
}Alternatively, if authentication is still needed, add password comparison logic after the query.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| select: { | |
| password: true | |
| } | |
| select: { | |
| // Remove password if not needed for authentication | |
| id: true | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/services/member.service.ts around lines 17 to 19, the code selects and
returns password data without any verification, which exposes sensitive
information. To fix this, remove the password field from the select clause if
the function is only for user retrieval. If the function is for authentication,
do not return the password directly; instead, fetch the password hash internally
and add logic to verify the provided password against the stored hash before
returning any user data.
i-am-that-guy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
don't blame me if this messes stuff up it's 3 am YOLOing it rn
Summary by CodeRabbit