Skip to content

Conversation

@shrutiiiyet
Copy link
Collaborator

@shrutiiiyet shrutiiiyet commented Jul 26, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved user lookup by email to ensure more accurate and secure retrieval of member information. Password is no longer required for this operation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The getUserByEmail function in the member service was refactored to remove the password parameter and related filtering logic. Correspondingly, the controller now calls this function with only the email argument. No changes were made to the signatures of exported or public entities in the controller.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/controllers/member.controller.ts Updated call to memberService.getUserByEmail to remove the password argument.
src/services/member.service.ts Refactored getUserByEmail to remove the password parameter and related query filtering logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Controller
    participant MemberService
    participant Database

    Controller->>MemberService: getUserByEmail(email)
    MemberService->>Database: Query user by email (select password from credential accounts)
    Database-->>MemberService: User data (with credential account passwords)
    MemberService-->>Controller: User data or error
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Harish-Naruto
  • i-am-that-guy

Poem

A hop and a skip, the password is gone,
Just email remains as the query goes on.
The service is lighter, the code is more neat,
Simpler and swifter, a bunny’s small feat!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm error Exit handler never called!
npm error This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
npm error https://github.com/npm/cli/issues
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-07-26T21_20_48_556Z-debug-0.log

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch minor-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/controllers/member.controller.ts (2)

10-16: Critical security issue: Authentication bypass.

The controller extracts password from query parameters but no longer uses it for verification. This means any request with just a valid email address will succeed, completely bypassing authentication.

The error message "Incorrect email or password" is also misleading since password verification was removed. Either:

  1. Restore password verification:
    const user = await memberService.getUserByEmail(email as string);
+   
+   // Add password verification logic here
+   const isValidPassword = await bcrypt.compare(password as string, user.accounts[0]?.password);
+   if (!isValidPassword) throw new ApiError('Incorrect email or password', 400);
  1. Or clarify this endpoint's purpose and update the error message:
-   if(!user) throw new ApiError('Incorrect email or password', 400);
+   if(!user) throw new ApiError('User not found', 404);

10-10: Remove unused password parameter.

The password is extracted from query parameters but never used. This could confuse API consumers who might expect authentication.

- const {email, password} = req.query;
+ const {email} = req.query;

Or implement proper password verification if this endpoint should authenticate users.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5ba083 and 4593314.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/controllers/member.controller.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/services/member.service.ts (2 hunks)


const {email, password} = req.query;

if(email && password) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update condition check for consistency.

Since password verification was removed, the condition should only check for email presence.

- if(email && password) {
+ if(email) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if(email && password) {
if (email) {
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/controllers/member.controller.ts at line 12, update the condition to
check only for the presence of email, removing the password check since password
verification was removed. Change the if statement to verify just the email
variable.

import { ApiError } from "../utils/apiError";

export const getUserByEmail = async(email: string, hashedPassword: string) => {
export const getUserByEmail = async(email: string) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Function behavior changed significantly - consider renaming.

The function signature change removes password verification entirely, changing this from an authentication function to a simple user retrieval function. The current name getUserByEmail doesn't indicate that it now returns password data without verification.

Consider renaming to something like getUserWithCredentialsByEmail to better reflect its current purpose, or create separate functions for authentication vs. user retrieval.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/services/member.service.ts at line 4, the function getUserByEmail no
longer performs password verification and now returns user data including
password information. Rename this function to something more descriptive like
getUserWithCredentialsByEmail to clearly indicate it returns sensitive
credential data without authentication. Alternatively, split the functionality
into two separate functions: one for user retrieval without credentials and
another for authentication with password verification.

Comment on lines +17 to +19
select: {
password: true
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Security concern: Password data exposure without verification.

The query now selects and returns password data without any verification. This means any caller can retrieve password hashes by just providing an email address.

If this function is intended for authentication, you need to add password verification logic. If it's for user retrieval only, consider whether exposing password data is necessary:

        select: {
-          password: true
+          // Remove password if not needed for authentication
+          id: true
        }

Alternatively, if authentication is still needed, add password comparison logic after the query.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
select: {
password: true
}
select: {
// Remove password if not needed for authentication
id: true
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/services/member.service.ts around lines 17 to 19, the code selects and
returns password data without any verification, which exposes sensitive
information. To fix this, remove the password field from the select clause if
the function is only for user retrieval. If the function is for authentication,
do not return the password directly; instead, fetch the password hash internally
and add logic to verify the provided password against the stored hash before
returning any user data.

Copy link
Member

@i-am-that-guy i-am-that-guy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't blame me if this messes stuff up it's 3 am YOLOing it rn

@shrutiiiyet shrutiiiyet merged commit f775c32 into main Jul 26, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants