-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
fix: remove vitest and mocha from bun lock #22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…on object documentation in topics route and removed vitest and mocha from bun lock
WalkthroughThis update corrects a typo in the route parameter for the PATCH endpoint in the progress routes and revises the API documentation for the DELETE topic endpoint by simplifying the success response details. No changes were made to logic, error handling, or exported entities. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/routes/topics.ts (1)
89-89: Nit – extra double-space before “Response status”
Minor formatting hitch:"status Response status."has two spaces.- * @apiSuccess {String="SUCCESS"} status Response status. + * @apiSuccess {String="SUCCESS"} status Response status.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/routes/progress.ts(1 hunks)src/routes/topics.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/routes/progress.ts (1)
41-42: Confirm external usages and documentation
A repository-wide search for the old:memeberIdparameter returned no matches (rg --glob '!dist' ':memeberId'), so there are no stale references within the codebase. However, please manually verify that all external consumers are updated to the new:memberIdspelling to avoid unexpected 404s:
- API clients or SDKs
- Integration and end-to-end tests
- API documentation (e.g., OpenAPI/Swagger specs, README examples)
| * @apiSuccess {String} message Confirmation message | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String="SUCCESS"} status Response status. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {Object} question question object. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {Number} question.id Question ID. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String} question.questionName Name of the question. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String} question.link Link to the question. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String="Easy","Medium","Hard"} question.difficulty Difficulty level of the question. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {Number} question.topicId Topic ID associated with the question. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {number} question.createdAt Timestamp when the question was created. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {number} question.updatedAt Timestamp when the question was last updated. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String} question.createdById ID of the user who created the question. | ||
| * @apiSuccess {String} question.updatedById ID of the user who last updated the question. | ||
| * | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Success response no longer documents question object – ensure handler matches
The docs now advertise only { message, status }, but the controller may still be returning the deleted topic (or an empty object). Mismatched docs → client confusion. Double-check deleteTopic’s actual return shape and update either the docs or implementation.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the deleteTopic handler and inspect its response shape
rg -n "deleteTopic" src/routes/topics.ts
rg -n -A 10 "deleteTopic" src/routes/topics.tsLength of output: 1216
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and display the implementation of deleteTopic in the topic controller
rg -n "deleteTopic" -A 20 src/controllers/topic.controller.tsLength of output: 390
Mismatch between docs and deleteTopic response
The deleteTopic controller (src/controllers/topic.controller.ts lines 47–50) only returns:
res.status(200).json({
status: "SUCCESS",
});but the API docs in src/routes/topics.ts (lines 88–90) still declare a message field:
- * @apiSuccess {String} message Confirmation message
* @apiSuccess {String="SUCCESS"} status Response status.Please choose one of the following fixes:
- Remove the
@apiSuccess {String} messageline from the docs, or - Extend the controller response to include a
messageproperty (e.g.res.status(200).json({ status: "SUCCESS", message: "Topic deleted successfully" }); ```)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/routes/topics.ts around lines 88 to 90, the API documentation declares a
message field in the deleteTopic response, but the actual controller response in
src/controllers/topic.controller.ts lines 47 to 50 does not include this
message. To fix this, either remove the @apiSuccess {String} message line from
the docs to match the current response, or update the deleteTopic controller to
include a message property in the JSON response, such as { status: "SUCCESS",
message: "Topic deleted successfully" }.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation