-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Interview fixes #37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interview fixes #37
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes enhance the deleteInterviewById controller to require a memberId in the request body, verify its presence, and confirm it matches the interview's memberId before deletion, returning 400 or 403 errors as appropriate. Corresponding tests were added or updated to cover these scenarios. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/controllers/interview.controller.ts(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/controllers/interview.controller.ts (1)
106-106: LGTM! Good security improvement.Adding memberId validation for delete operations improves security and maintains consistency with the update function. The error handling is appropriate with a clear message and correct 400 status code.
Also applies to: 112-114
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/Interview.test.ts(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/Interview.test.ts (4)
316-347: LGTM! Test updated to reflect new controller requirements.The test correctly includes
memberIdin the request body and consolidates mock setup calls, aligning with the new authorization requirements in the controller.
349-358: LGTM! Test properly updated for new requirements.The test correctly includes the required
memberIdin the request body while maintaining coverage for invalid ID validation.
360-369: LGTM! Essential test coverage for new validation.This test case properly covers the scenario where
memberIdis missing from the request body, which is now a required validation in the controller.
371-405: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for authorization logic.Both test cases are well-implemented:
- The "interview not found" test is properly updated with the required
memberId- The new authorization test correctly validates that users can only delete their own interviews
The mock setup and assertions properly test the expected error scenarios.
| afterEach(() => { | ||
| jest.restoreAllMocks(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move the afterEach hook to global scope for consistency.
The afterEach hook for mock cleanup should be applied globally rather than only to the deleteInterviewById test suite, since other test suites in this file also use Jest mocks.
+afterEach(() => {
+ jest.restoreAllMocks();
+});
+
describe('getInterviews', () => { describe('deleteInterviewById', () => {
- afterEach(() => {
- jest.restoreAllMocks();
- });
-
it('should return 200 and success message', async () => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| afterEach(() => { | |
| jest.restoreAllMocks(); | |
| }); | |
| afterEach(() => { | |
| jest.restoreAllMocks(); | |
| }); | |
| describe('getInterviews', () => { | |
| // … existing getInterviews tests … | |
| }); | |
| describe('deleteInterviewById', () => { | |
| it('should return 200 and success message', async () => { | |
| // … test implementation … | |
| }); | |
| // … other deleteInterviewById tests … | |
| }); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In tests/Interview.test.ts around lines 312 to 314, the afterEach hook that
calls jest.restoreAllMocks() is currently scoped only to the deleteInterviewById
test suite. Move this afterEach hook to the global scope of the test file,
outside any describe blocks, so that it runs after each test in all suites,
ensuring consistent mock cleanup across the entire file.
Summary by CodeRabbit