Skip to content

Conversation

@Sherin-2711
Copy link
Member

@Sherin-2711 Sherin-2711 commented Aug 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error messaging by changing the update authorization error code from 403 to 401.
    • Enhanced security for deleting interview experiences by requiring member identity verification and providing clear error messages for missing or mismatched member IDs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the deleteInterviewById controller to require a memberId in the request body, verify its presence, and confirm it matches the interview's memberId before deletion, returning 400 or 403 errors as appropriate. Corresponding tests were added or updated to cover these scenarios.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Interview Controller Authorization Updates
src/controllers/interview.controller.ts
Added requirement for memberId in deleteInterviewById request body. Added authorization check comparing memberId with interview owner, returning 400 or 403 errors accordingly. No signature changes.
Interview Controller Test Enhancements
tests/Interview.test.ts
Added tests for deleteInterviewById covering missing memberId (400), non-matching memberId (403), invalid ID (400), and not found (404). Updated existing tests to include memberId and added Jest mock cleanup after each test.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A bunny hops through fields of code,
Where interviews are now bestowed
With checks for who can change or clear—
Only the right member may appear.
Error codes now hop in line,
Security’s carrot: crisp and fine! 🥕

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 781c5a7 and 5ac1593.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/controllers/interview.controller.ts (1 hunks)
  • tests/Interview.test.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/controllers/interview.controller.ts
  • tests/Interview.test.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch interview-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b7a6e6b and b79d1c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/controllers/interview.controller.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/controllers/interview.controller.ts (1)

106-106: LGTM! Good security improvement.

Adding memberId validation for delete operations improves security and maintains consistency with the update function. The error handling is appropriate with a clear message and correct 400 status code.

Also applies to: 112-114

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b79d1c2 and 781c5a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/Interview.test.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/Interview.test.ts (4)

316-347: LGTM! Test updated to reflect new controller requirements.

The test correctly includes memberId in the request body and consolidates mock setup calls, aligning with the new authorization requirements in the controller.


349-358: LGTM! Test properly updated for new requirements.

The test correctly includes the required memberId in the request body while maintaining coverage for invalid ID validation.


360-369: LGTM! Essential test coverage for new validation.

This test case properly covers the scenario where memberId is missing from the request body, which is now a required validation in the controller.


371-405: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for authorization logic.

Both test cases are well-implemented:

  • The "interview not found" test is properly updated with the required memberId
  • The new authorization test correctly validates that users can only delete their own interviews

The mock setup and assertions properly test the expected error scenarios.

Comment on lines +312 to +314
afterEach(() => {
jest.restoreAllMocks();
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Move the afterEach hook to global scope for consistency.

The afterEach hook for mock cleanup should be applied globally rather than only to the deleteInterviewById test suite, since other test suites in this file also use Jest mocks.

+afterEach(() => {
+  jest.restoreAllMocks();
+});
+
 describe('getInterviews', () => {
 describe('deleteInterviewById', () => {
-  afterEach(() => {
-    jest.restoreAllMocks();
-  });
-
   it('should return 200 and success message', async () => {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
afterEach(() => {
jest.restoreAllMocks();
});
afterEach(() => {
jest.restoreAllMocks();
});
describe('getInterviews', () => {
// … existing getInterviews tests …
});
describe('deleteInterviewById', () => {
it('should return 200 and success message', async () => {
// … test implementation …
});
// … other deleteInterviewById tests …
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In tests/Interview.test.ts around lines 312 to 314, the afterEach hook that
calls jest.restoreAllMocks() is currently scoped only to the deleteInterviewById
test suite. Move this afterEach hook to the global scope of the test file,
outside any describe blocks, so that it runs after each test in all suites,
ensuring consistent mock cleanup across the entire file.

@i-am-that-guy i-am-that-guy merged commit f77737a into main Aug 9, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants