Merged
Conversation
kks32
requested review from
jgiven100 and
kks32
and removed request for
jgiven100
Contributor
Contributor
|
@jgiven100 Thanks. I have fixed the deploy issue. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the PR
I'm proposing here possible corrections / clarifications in the documentation. Typos, mostly, plus some non-typos minor changes (in my opinion) hoping to improve consistency in some places.
Goal is to improve even further reader's experience at https://mpm.cb-geo.com/#/
Additional context
I'm one of @SchDvr PhD supervisors at INRAE (south of France) and we thank you once again for providing us with an open-source documented MPM code.