Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 19, 2025

📄 3,362% (33.62x) speedup for LabelStudioAnnotation.to_dict in unstructured/staging/label_studio.py

⏱️ Runtime : 13.3 milliseconds 385 microseconds (best of 135 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves a dramatic 3361% speedup by eliminating expensive deep copy operations and using more efficient data structures.

Key optimizations:

  1. Replaced deepcopy(self.__dict__) with dict(self.__dict__): The original code used deepcopy twice - once to create the initial dictionary and again to create _annotation_dict. The profiler shows these deepcopy calls consumed 97.8% of the total runtime (65.1% + 32.7%). The optimization uses a shallow copy instead, which is orders of magnitude faster since we only need the top-level dictionary structure.

  2. Dictionary comprehension instead of pop operations: The final filtering step was replaced from a loop with .pop() calls to a single dictionary comprehension {k: v for k, v in annotation_dict.items() if v is not None}. This eliminates the need for the second deepcopy entirely and is more efficient than iterating and mutating the dictionary.

Why this works safely: The shallow copy is sufficient because the code immediately replaces the nested objects (result and reviews) with new lists created by calling .to_dict() on their elements. This means the original nested structure isn't shared, maintaining the same isolation behavior as the deep copy.

Performance impact: The profiler shows the time dropped from 87.9ms to 1.9ms for the core function logic, with most time now spent on the actual work (converting results/reviews) rather than unnecessary copying. This optimization is particularly beneficial for objects with many fields or nested structures, making it ideal for data serialization workflows where to_dict() may be called frequently.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 77 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 88.9%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
staging/test_label_studio.py::test_created_annotation 25.4μs 1.62μs 1462%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-LabelStudioAnnotation.to_dict-mjcbd4c4 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization achieves a dramatic **3361% speedup** by eliminating expensive deep copy operations and using more efficient data structures.

**Key optimizations:**

1. **Replaced `deepcopy(self.__dict__)` with `dict(self.__dict__)`**: The original code used `deepcopy` twice - once to create the initial dictionary and again to create `_annotation_dict`. The profiler shows these `deepcopy` calls consumed 97.8% of the total runtime (65.1% + 32.7%). The optimization uses a shallow copy instead, which is orders of magnitude faster since we only need the top-level dictionary structure.

2. **Dictionary comprehension instead of pop operations**: The final filtering step was replaced from a loop with `.pop()` calls to a single dictionary comprehension `{k: v for k, v in annotation_dict.items() if v is not None}`. This eliminates the need for the second `deepcopy` entirely and is more efficient than iterating and mutating the dictionary.

**Why this works safely**: The shallow copy is sufficient because the code immediately replaces the nested objects (`result` and `reviews`) with new lists created by calling `.to_dict()` on their elements. This means the original nested structure isn't shared, maintaining the same isolation behavior as the deep copy.

**Performance impact**: The profiler shows the time dropped from 87.9ms to 1.9ms for the core function logic, with most time now spent on the actual work (converting results/reviews) rather than unnecessary copying. This optimization is particularly beneficial for objects with many fields or nested structures, making it ideal for data serialization workflows where `to_dict()` may be called frequently.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from aseembits93 December 19, 2025 03:32
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants