Skip to content

Conversation

@trichoplax
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request continues from #1037 that was from MoshiKoi's fork. It's now a branch on the QPixel repo to allow any QPixel developer to work on it. See the discussion on that previous pull request.

Fixes #1025.

MoshiKoi and others added 5 commits April 20, 2023 21:41
Instead of special casing creating a notification,
we just have them follow normally automatically.
Remove special case notifying author of threads.

This merge takes the changes so far from MoshiKoi's fork to a new branch `MoshiKoi/1025/remove-special-case-notifying-author-of-threads` in the `qpixel` repo. This will allow any qpixel developer access to continue work on this new branch and make a new pull request into `develop`.
@trichoplax trichoplax marked this pull request as draft March 3, 2025 23:15
…hreads' of github.com:codidact/qpixel into MoshiKoi/1025/remove-special-case-notifying-author-of-threads
Now that pull request 1548 makes post author notification of new
threads part of the standard post following rather than an
author-specific special case, the author needs to be a follower
of the post in the test fixtures to prevent a test failing.
The test is:

test/controllers/comments_controller_test.rb
'Should create new thread'
Line 18
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.79%. Comparing base (8f93b46) to head (7846110).

Additional details and impacted files
Components Coverage Δ
controllers 70.87% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
helpers 81.92% <ø> (ø)
jobs 60.00% <ø> (ø)
models 86.87% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
tasks 61.11% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@trichoplax trichoplax marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2025 20:43
@Oaphi Oaphi requested review from a team and cellio August 21, 2025 23:53
@trichoplax trichoplax marked this pull request as draft August 21, 2025 23:58
@trichoplax
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that there is a suggested migration approach in a comment on the original version of this pull request, which will need to be added to this new pull request before merging. I haven't implemented this migration yet because it needs to come after the migration in #1920 so I'll wait until any changes requested during its review to ensure this one is dated later than that one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

6 participants