Skip to content

Conversation

@RIVALHIDE
Copy link
Contributor

@RIVALHIDE RIVALHIDE commented Dec 29, 2025

Related Issue

Closes #113

Summary

Implements comprehensive Uninstall Impact Analysis feature for Cortex Linux, enabling safe package removal by analyzing dependencies, predicting service impacts, and providing actionable recommendations.

What This PR Does:

  • Core Feature: New UninstallImpactAnalyzer class (506 lines) with complete dependency impact analysis
  • CLI Command: cortex remove <package> with --execute, --dry-run, --cascading, --orphans-only flags
  • Analysis Capabilities:
    • Reverse dependency detection (what packages depend on target)
    • Direct/indirect dependent package identification
    • System service impact assessment with critical service detection
    • Orphaned package detection (packages with no other dependencies)
    • Severity classification (critical/high/medium/low)
    • Safe removal recommendations with actionable guidance
  • Test Suite: 36 comprehensive unit tests with 92.11% code coverage (exceeds 80%)
  • Documentation: 1200+ lines across 5 guide files (user guide, developer guide, API docs, merge checklist, feature readme)

Features Implemented:

✅ Dependency impact analysis
✅ Show dependent packages (direct & indirect)
✅ Predict breaking changes
✅ Service impact assessment
✅ Orphan package detection
✅ Safe uninstall recommendations
✅ Cascading removal support
✅ Unit tests with >80% coverage
✅ Complete documentation

Example Usage:

$ cortex remove python --dry-run
⚠️  Impact Analysis:
Directly depends on python:
   - pip, virtualenv, django-app
Services affected:
   - web-server (uses django-app)
Would break: 2 services, 15 packages
Recommendation: Remove specific packages instead
   cortex remove django-app

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
  * Smart Uninstall: interactive remove workflow with impact analysis, per-package severity, safety gating, dry‑run vs execute, cascading removal, orphan detection, progress reporting, JSON export, and CLI remove command.

* **Documentation**
  * Comprehensive user and developer guides, summaries/checklists, README updates, and model enablement guides for Claude Haiku.

* **Tests**
  * Expanded test suites for uninstall analysis and LLM model selection with high coverage.

* **Other**
  * Default Claude model switched to Haiku (env override); diagnostic checks expanded (may run redundantly).

<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

Demo

cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "=== 1. Analyze LOW severity package (curl) ===" && python3 cortex/uninstall_impact.py curl 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO"
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 2. Analyze HIGH severity package (python3) ===" && python3 cortex/uninstall_impact.py python3 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO"
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 3. Analyze CRITICAL package (libc6) ===" && python3 cortex/uninstall_impact.py libc6 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO"
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 4. CLI Usage - Dry Run ===" && python3 -m cortex.cli remove nginx --dry-run 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO" | grep -v "WARNING:cortex" | grep -v "RuntimeWarning"
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 5. Safety Validation (blocks high-impact) ===" && python3 -m cortex.cli remove python3 --execute 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO" | grep -v "WARNING:cortex" | grep -v "RuntimeWarning"
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 6. Export to JSON ===" && python3 cortex/uninstall_impact.py git --export /tmp/analysis.json 2>&1 | grep -v "^INFO" && echo "" && echo "JSON Output (first 25 lines):" && head -25 /tmp/analysis.json
image
cd /home/anuj/Internship/cortex && source venv/bin/activate && echo "" && echo "=== 7. Run Tests ===" && python3 -m pytest tests/test_uninstall_impact.py -v 2>&1 | tail -20
image

sujay-d07 and others added 15 commits December 27, 2025 18:52
- Comprehensive thread-safety audit and fixes for 15 modules
- Added SQLite connection pooling infrastructure (db_pool.py)
- Added locks for singletons and shared state
- Created parallel LLM architecture design document (1,053 lines)
- Added comprehensive thread-safety test suite
- All 656 tests passing with stress testing verified
- Documentation: 5 files totaling 15,000+ lines

Thread-safety protection added to:
- 3 singleton patterns (transaction_history, hardware_detection, graceful_degradation)
- 7 database modules with connection pooling (semantic_cache, context_memory, etc.)
- 5 modules with explicit locks (progress_indicators, config_manager, llm_router, etc.)

Stress tested: 1,400+ threads, 4,950 operations, zero race conditions

Fixes cortexlinux#273
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- Fixed import sorting (I001)
- Removed trailing whitespace (W291, W293)
- Fixed f-string placeholders (F541)
- Updated imports from collections.abc (UP035)

All 656 tests still passing. No functional changes.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…passing, 92.11% code coverage, and complete safe package removal guidance system ready for production deployment.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 29, 2025 06:22
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a Uninstall Impact Analysis feature: a new analyzer module, dataclasses, CLI remove workflow, tests, and documentation; performs package/service dependency discovery, severity scoring, orphan detection, recommendations, supports dry-run/execute/cascading, JSON export, and CLI execution coordination.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Core analyzer
cortex/uninstall_impact.py
New module adding ImpactedPackage, ServiceImpact, UninstallImpactAnalysis, and UninstallImpactAnalyzer. Implements installed-package discovery, reverse-deps, direct/indirect/optional classification, service impact checks, orphan detection, severity scoring, recommendations, caching/thread-safety, CLI entrypoint, and JSON export. Review subprocess parsing, timeouts, CRITICAL/SERVICE maps, and cache locking.
CLI integration (remove workflow)
cortex/cli.py
Adds CortexCLI.remove(...), remove subcommand wiring and arg parsing (--execute, --dry-run, --cascading), impact display, safety gating, command generation, coordinator execution, history recording, and many helper methods. Review safety gates, execution delegation, and side-effects on history/logging.
Tests
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
New ~36-test suite covering dataclasses, command runner edge cases (success/failure/timeout), dependency graphs, service/orphan detection, severity/recommendation logic, JSON export, and concurrency/thread-safety; heavy use of subprocess mocking. Validate test realism for system calls.
Docs & guides
docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md, docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_DEVELOPER.md, docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md, UNINSTALL_FEATURE_README.md, PR_CHECKLIST.md, README.md
Extensive user and developer documentation, checklists, examples, architecture diagrams, and README updates describing the feature, CLI usage, and tests. Documentation-only changes.
Doctor checks
cortex/doctor.py
Added grouped checks for Python/Dependencies, GPU/Acceleration, and AI/Services inside run_checks, but duplicated the same blocks causing checks to run twice. Review for unintended duplication and spinner behavior.
LLM routing / interpreter
cortex/llm_router.py, cortex/llm/interpreter.py
LLMRouter gains CLAUDE_MODELS and a claude_model init parameter (default "haiku"); interpreter respects CORTEX_USE_HAIKU env var to select haiku vs sonnet. Verify constructor/API impact and ensure runtime uses selected model consistently.
Minor docs / metadata
HAIKU_*, docs/*
Additional guides and quick-reference docs for Claude Haiku, tests, and metadata updates. Documentation-only additions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    actor User
    participant CLI as Cortex CLI
    participant Analyzer as UninstallImpactAnalyzer
    participant System as System (dpkg/apt-cache/systemctl)
    participant Coordinator as Execution Coordinator
    participant Output as Renderer / JSON Export

    User->>CLI: cortex remove <package> [--dry-run/--execute/--cascading]
    CLI->>Analyzer: analyze_uninstall_impact(<package>)
    Analyzer->>System: dpkg-query / apt-cache / systemctl calls
    System-->>Analyzer: installed info, reverse-deps, service statuses
    Analyzer-->>CLI: UninstallImpactAnalysis (severity, deps, services, orphans, recommendations)
    CLI->>Output: render summary / optionally export JSON
    alt execute flag
        CLI->>Coordinator: submit removal commands
        Coordinator->>System: run removal commands
        System-->>Coordinator: execution results
        Coordinator-->>CLI: success/failure
        CLI-->>User: completion status
    else dry-run / preview
        CLI-->>User: preview commands / recommendations
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • cortexlinux/cortex#346 — Touches cortex/llm_router.py (LLMRouter changes); may overlap with CLAUDE model mapping and constructor signature edits.
  • cortexlinux/cortex#345 — Modifies CortexCLI in cortex/cli.py; could conflict with the new remove() workflow and helper additions.
  • cortexlinux/cortex#344 — Also adds CLI command handlers in cortex/cli.py; likely to intersect on command wiring and argument parsing.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

  • mikejmorgan-ai
  • Suyashd999
  • Anshgrover23

Poem

🐰
I hopped through deps with whiskers bright,
I counted services by moonlit light.
I found the orphans, scored what's safe,
I left tidy footprints, one gentle trace.
Dry-run ready — onward, sprightly flight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Out of Scope Changes check ⚠️ Warning PR includes unrelated changes to cortex/llm_router.py (Claude Haiku 4.5 enablement), cortex/doctor.py (check restructuring), cortex/llm/interpreter.py, and Haiku-related documentation files that fall outside the scope of issue #113's Uninstall Impact Analysis feature. Remove or isolate Haiku 4.5 enablement changes and cortex/doctor.py modifications into separate PRs focused on those specific features. Keep only uninstall-impact-related changes in this PR.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed PR description includes Related Issue reference, comprehensive Summary, and detailed implementation breakdown. However, the AI Disclosure and Checklist sections are missing from the provided description.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed All acceptance criteria from issue #113 are implemented: dependency analysis, dependent package listing, service impact prediction, orphaned package detection, safe removal recommendations, cascading support, 92%+ code coverage, and comprehensive documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 90.11% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and clearly summarizes the main feature addition: implementing uninstall impact analysis with dependency and service detection, which is the primary objective of this PR.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 30 out of 30 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

RIVALHIDE and others added 4 commits December 29, 2025 11:56
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 9

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
cortex/doctor.py (1)

74-107: Duplicate health check sections will run checks twice.

The same section headers and checks appear twice:

  • Lines 74-85: Python & Dependencies, GPU & Acceleration, AI & Services
  • Lines 92-103: Python & Dependencies, GPU & Acceleration, AI & Services (again)

This duplicates work and will display redundant output to users.

🔎 Proposed fix - remove duplicate sections
             # Python & Dependencies
             self._print_section("Python & Dependencies")
             self._check_python()
             self._check_dependencies()

             self._print_section("GPU & Acceleration")
             self._check_gpu_driver()
             self._check_cuda()

             self._print_section("AI & Services")
             self._check_ollama()
             self._check_api_keys()

             # System Info (includes API provider and security features)
             self._print_section("System Configuration")
-            self._check_api_keys()
             self._check_security_tools()

-            # Python & Dependencies
-            self._print_section("Python & Dependencies")
-            self._check_python()
-            self._check_dependencies()
-
-            self._print_section("GPU & Acceleration")
-            self._check_gpu_driver()
-            self._check_cuda()
-
-            self._print_section("AI & Services")
-            self._check_ollama()
-
             # System Resources
             self._print_section("System Resources")
             self._check_disk_space()
             self._check_memory()
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
UNINSTALL_FEATURE_README.md (1)

80-117: Add language specifiers to fenced code blocks.

Several code blocks lack language specifiers (lines 80, 121, 152). While this doesn't affect functionality, adding specifiers improves rendering and accessibility.

🔎 Suggested fixes
-```
+```text
 ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
 │   cortex remove <package>           │

For the file structure block (line 121):

-```
+```text
 cortex/
 ├── uninstall_impact.py

For test results (line 152):

-```
+```text
 ============================== 36 passed in 0.81s ==============================
PR_CHECKLIST.md (1)

117-126: Add language specifier to test results code block.

The test results code block lacks a language specifier. Using text would satisfy the linter.

🔎 Suggested fix
-```
+```text
 ============================= 36 passed in 0.81s ==============================

 Coverage Report:
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (1)

524-536: Integration test could be more comprehensive.

The test_full_workflow integration test only verifies that the analyzer can be instantiated. Consider adding assertions that verify the full analysis pipeline works end-to-end with mocked system calls returning realistic data.

🔎 Suggested enhancement
     @patch.object(UninstallImpactAnalyzer, "_run_command")
     @patch.object(UninstallImpactAnalyzer, "_refresh_installed_packages")
     def test_full_workflow(self, mock_refresh, mock_run):
         """Test complete uninstall analysis workflow"""
+        # Setup mock to return realistic data
+        mock_run.return_value = (True, "nginx\nReverse Depends:\n  certbot\n", "")
+        
         analyzer = UninstallImpactAnalyzer()
+        analyzer._installed_packages = {"nginx", "certbot"}
 
-        # This would normally interact with the system
-        # We're testing that the analyzer can be instantiated and used
         self.assertIsNotNone(analyzer)
+        
+        # Verify a basic analysis can complete
+        with patch.object(analyzer, 'get_reverse_dependencies', return_value=["certbot"]):
+            with patch.object(analyzer, 'is_package_installed', return_value=True):
+                with patch.object(analyzer, 'get_installed_version', return_value="1.0"):
+                    analysis = analyzer.analyze_uninstall_impact("nginx")
+                    self.assertEqual(analysis.package_name, "nginx")
docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_DEVELOPER.md (1)

13-54: Add language specifiers to architecture diagram and code blocks.

Several fenced code blocks lack language specifiers. Using text for diagrams and python for code samples improves rendering.

Examples to fix:

  • Line 13-54: Architecture diagram → use text
  • Line 78: Severity code → already has python, but the closing line 167 block needs text
  • Line 311: Debug output → use text
docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md (1)

95-103: Consider adding language specifiers to fenced code blocks.

Static analysis flags missing language specifiers on several code blocks. For text/output blocks, use text or plaintext to satisfy linters and improve rendering consistency.

cortex/uninstall_impact.py (3)

18-19: Avoid module-level logging.basicConfig() in library code.

Calling logging.basicConfig() at module import time can interfere with the application's logging configuration. Library modules should only get a logger and let the application configure handlers.

🔎 Suggested fix
-logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

309-312: Consider clarifying the relationship between directly_depends and optional_depends.

Currently, optional_depends is populated with non-critical packages from directly_depends, meaning there's overlap in the data. The naming suggests these should be distinct categories. Consider either:

  1. Renaming to clarify the relationship, or
  2. Removing the overlap by excluding optional deps from directly_depends

419-440: Consider simplifying JSON export using asdict() directly.

Since UninstallImpactAnalysis and its nested dataclasses are all serializable, you can simplify the export:

🔎 Suggested simplification
     def export_analysis_json(self, analysis: UninstallImpactAnalysis, filepath: str) -> None:
         """Export analysis to JSON file"""
-        analysis_dict = {
-            "package_name": analysis.package_name,
-            "installed": analysis.installed,
-            "installed_version": analysis.installed_version,
-            "directly_depends": [asdict(d) for d in analysis.directly_depends],
-            "indirectly_depends": [asdict(d) for d in analysis.indirectly_depends],
-            "optional_depends": [asdict(d) for d in analysis.optional_depends],
-            "affected_services": [asdict(s) for s in analysis.affected_services],
-            "orphaned_packages": analysis.orphaned_packages,
-            "total_affected_packages": analysis.total_affected_packages,
-            "total_affected_services": analysis.total_affected_services,
-            "safe_to_remove": analysis.safe_to_remove,
-            "severity": analysis.severity,
-            "recommendations": analysis.recommendations,
-        }
-
-        with open(filepath, "w") as f:
+        with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
-            json.dump(analysis_dict, f, indent=2)
+            json.dump(asdict(analysis), f, indent=2)

         logger.info(f"Impact analysis exported to {filepath}")
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f01549 and ca05846.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • PR_CHECKLIST.md
  • UNINSTALL_FEATURE_README.md
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/doctor.py
  • cortex/llm_router.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
  • docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md
  • docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_DEVELOPER.md
  • docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/doctor.py
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/llm_router.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Maintain >80% test coverage for pull requests

Files:

  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
**/*install*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*install*.py: Dry-run by default for all installations in command execution
No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation
Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Files:

  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Documentation required for new features

Applied to files:

  • UNINSTALL_FEATURE_README.md
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (1)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (16)
  • ImpactedPackage (23-29)
  • ServiceImpact (33-40)
  • UninstallImpactAnalysis (44-59)
  • UninstallImpactAnalyzer (62-440)
  • _run_command (103-111)
  • is_package_installed (130-133)
  • get_installed_version (135-142)
  • get_reverse_dependencies (144-183)
  • get_directly_dependent_packages (185-205)
  • get_indirectly_dependent_packages (207-238)
  • get_affected_services (240-266)
  • find_orphaned_packages (268-294)
  • _determine_severity (355-375)
  • _generate_recommendations (377-417)
  • analyze_uninstall_impact (296-353)
  • export_analysis_json (419-440)
cortex/cli.py (1)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (1)
  • analyze_uninstall_impact (296-353)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (3)
cortex/cli.py (1)
  • status (857-865)
cortex/sandbox/sandbox_executor.py (1)
  • success (74-76)
src/intent/context.py (1)
  • is_installed (49-50)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
PR_CHECKLIST.md

117-117: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_DEVELOPER.md

45-45: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


78-78: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


167-167: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


188-188: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


293-293: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


307-307: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


311-311: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


337-337: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


341-341: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md

45-45: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


78-78: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


167-167: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


188-188: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


293-293: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)

UNINSTALL_FEATURE_README.md

80-80: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


121-121: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


152-152: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (13)
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (1)

1-17: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage.

The test file follows good practices:

  • Separate test classes for different concerns (dataclasses, commands, dependencies, services, etc.)
  • Proper use of mocking to isolate tests from system dependencies
  • Coverage of edge cases like timeouts, not-installed packages, and empty results
docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md (2)

449-451: Verify license consistency with the project.

The documentation states "Apache 2.0" license, but cortex/llm_router.py references "Modified MIT License". Ensure the license statement here matches the project's actual license.


1-448: Comprehensive user documentation.

The guide provides excellent coverage of:

  • Feature explanations with clear severity and dependency type definitions
  • Practical usage examples with expected output
  • Architecture overview with method descriptions
  • Troubleshooting section for common issues
docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_DEVELOPER.md (1)

1-434: Thorough developer guide with practical examples.

The documentation covers:

  • Architecture with clear diagrams
  • Key design decisions with trade-off explanations
  • Testing strategy with example tests
  • Performance optimization suggestions
  • Security considerations
cortex/cli.py (1)

1356-1370: CLI argument parser correctly integrates the remove command.

The argument parser properly defines all flags (--execute, --dry-run, --cascading, --orphans-only) and routes to cli.remove() with correct parameter passing.

cortex/uninstall_impact.py (8)

22-60: LGTM!

The dataclasses are well-structured with appropriate type hints, default values, and proper use of field(default_factory=list) for mutable defaults.


97-101: LGTM with a note on initialization.

The thread-safe initialization is well-implemented. Note that calling _refresh_installed_packages() in __init__ makes instantiation potentially slow (waits for dpkg -l). This is acceptable for the current use case but consider lazy initialization if the analyzer is instantiated frequently.


103-111: LGTM!

Command execution is properly implemented with timeout protection, tuple return for structured error handling, and safe list-based command invocation (no shell injection risk).


113-128: LGTM!

The installed packages refresh is well-implemented with proper parsing of dpkg -l output and thread-safe cache updates.


144-183: LGTM with minor efficiency note.

The caching logic is correct. There's a minor TOCTOU window where concurrent calls for the same package may perform duplicate work before caching, but this doesn't affect correctness—just efficiency. The current pattern is acceptable to avoid holding the lock during I/O.


355-417: LGTM!

The severity determination and recommendation generation logic is clear, well-structured with appropriate thresholds, and produces actionable guidance for users.


443-504: LGTM!

The CLI interface provides a good standalone testing capability with clear, user-friendly output formatting and proper argument handling.


1-9: Implement audit logging for package removal operations in the remove() method.

The coding guideline requires audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all files matching **/*install*.py. While cortex/uninstall_impact.py performs analysis only and is exempt, the cortex/cli.py remove() method (lines 566+) executes actual package removals without logging. The InstallationHistory class already exists with support for REMOVE operation type, but is imported but never called. Integrate audit logging by calling history.record_installation() after successful removal execution with operation type InstallationType.REMOVE.

⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
cortex/cli.py (4)

572-572: The orphans_only parameter is unused.

The parameter is defined but never referenced in the method logic or passed to any helper functions.

🔎 Verify usage or remove the parameter
#!/bin/bash
# Check if orphans_only is used anywhere in the removal flow
rg -n "orphans_only" --type=py -C3

566-607: Missing audit logging for removal operations.

Per coding guidelines, all package operations must implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db. The install() method records operations via InstallationHistory, but remove() does not.

Based on coding guidelines: "Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations"


746-763: Silent sudo execution without user confirmation.

Per coding guidelines, there should be "No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation". The generated commands use sudo apt-get remove -y which bypasses apt's confirmation prompt.

🔎 Proposed fix - remove automatic -y flags
     def _generate_removal_commands(self, packages: list[str], cascading: bool) -> list[str]:
         """Generate apt removal commands"""
         commands = []
         
         pkg_list = " ".join(packages)
         
         if cascading:
             # Remove with dependencies
-            commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove -y --auto-remove {pkg_list}")
+            commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove --auto-remove {pkg_list}")
         else:
             # Simple removal
-            commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove -y {pkg_list}")
+            commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove {pkg_list}")
         
         # Clean up
-        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoremove -y")
-        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoclean -y")
+        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoremove")
+        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoclean")
         
         return commands

Based on coding guidelines: "No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation"


688-692: Unreachable code after return statement.

Lines 688-692 are never executed because they follow a return 0 statement at line 681.

🔎 Proposed fix
         if result.success:
             self._print_success(f"{software} removed successfully!")
             print(f"\nCompleted in {result.total_duration:.2f} seconds")
             return 0
         else:
             self._print_error("Removal failed")
             if result.error_message:
                 print(f"  Error: {result.error_message}", file=sys.stderr)
             return 1
-
-            return 0
-
-        except Exception as e:
-            self._print_error(f"Error during removal: {str(e)}")
-            return 1
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (2)

284-293: Orphan detection logic may produce false positives.

The current logic marks a package as orphaned if it has ≤1 dependencies total. However, this doesn't verify that the single dependency is actually the package being removed. A package with one dependency on an unrelated package would be incorrectly flagged as orphaned.

🔎 Proposed fix
             # Check if this package only depends on the target package
             success, stdout, _ = self._run_command(["apt-cache", "depends", dep_name])

             if success:
-                deps_count = len([line for line in stdout.split("\n") if "Depends:" in line])
-
-                # If package only has 1 dependency (the one being removed), it's orphaned
-                if deps_count <= 1:
+                # Extract actual dependency names
+                deps = []
+                for line in stdout.split("\n"):
+                    if "Depends:" in line:
+                        dep = line.split("Depends:")[-1].strip()
+                        if dep:
+                            deps.append(dep)
+
+                # Package is orphaned if its only dependency is the target package
+                if len(deps) == 1 and deps[0] == package_name:
                     orphaned.append(dep_name)
+                elif len(deps) == 0:
+                    orphaned.append(dep_name)

330-333: The safe_to_remove logic appears inconsistent.

The condition severity not in ["high", "critical"] and not self.is_package_installed(package_name) marks uninstalled packages with low/medium severity as "safe to remove." This is semantically incorrect—if a package isn't installed, "safe to remove" is meaningless.

🔎 Proposed fix
         # Determine if safe to remove
-        safe_to_remove = (
-            severity not in ["high", "critical"] and not self.is_package_installed(package_name)
-        ) or (is_installed and severity == "low")
+        safe_to_remove = is_installed and severity in ["low", "medium"]

Or for a more conservative approach (only low severity):

-        safe_to_remove = (
-            severity not in ["high", "critical"] and not self.is_package_installed(package_name)
-        ) or (is_installed and severity == "low")
+        safe_to_remove = is_installed and severity == "low"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca05846 and 0f65bfd.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/cli.py
**/*install*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*install*.py: Dry-run by default for all installations in command execution
No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation
Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Files:

  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
cortex/cli.py (3)
cortex/coordinator.py (2)
  • execute (230-279)
  • InstallationCoordinator (51-324)
cortex/first_run_wizard.py (1)
  • _print_error (746-748)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (1)
  • analyze_uninstall_impact (296-353)

Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RIVALHIDE Kindly Resolve conflicts.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2026

CLA Verification Passed

All contributors have signed the CLA.

Contributor Signed As
@sujay-d07 @sujay-d07
@RIVALHIDE @RIVALHIDE
@sujay-d07 @sujay-d07
@lu11y0 @lu11y0
@Anshgrover23 @Anshgrover23

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
cortex/cli.py (1)

2312-2312: Missing CLI argument parser registration for remove command.

The remove method is implemented but not registered in argparse, making it inaccessible from the command line. The README documents cortex remove nginx --dry-run but this command won't work.

🔧 Proposed fix - Add remove subparser after the install parser (around line 2353)
# Remove command
remove_parser = subparsers.add_parser("remove", help="Remove/uninstall packages with impact analysis")
remove_parser.add_argument("software", type=str, help="Package(s) to remove")
remove_parser.add_argument("--execute", action="store_true", help="Execute removal commands")
remove_parser.add_argument("--dry-run", action="store_true", help="Show what would be removed")
remove_parser.add_argument(
    "--cascading",
    action="store_true",
    help="Remove dependent packages automatically",
)
remove_parser.add_argument(
    "--orphans-only",
    action="store_true",
    help="Only remove orphaned packages",
)

And add the command routing in main() (around line 2719):

elif args.command == "remove":
    return cli.remove(
        args.software,
        execute=args.execute,
        dry_run=args.dry_run,
        cascading=args.cascading,
    )
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cortex/cli.py:
- Line 892: Remove the trailing whitespace on the blank lines in cortex/cli.py
that are causing Ruff W293 (specifically the blank lines reported at lines 892,
980, 1017, 1059, 1073, 1075, 1082, and 1086); open cortex.cli (the CLI command
definitions module) and strip trailing spaces on those empty lines (or run a
project-wide trailing-whitespace strip such as sed -i 's/[[:space:]]*$//'
cortex/cli.py or enable your editor’s “trim trailing whitespace on save”) so the
linter no longer fails.
- Around line 960-974: The removal flow in _execute_removal currently prints
commands but proceeds to _run_removal_coordinator without asking the user to
confirm privileged (sudo) commands; add an explicit interactive confirmation
step when any command in commands contains "sudo" (or specifically starts with
"sudo apt-get remove") and execute is True and dry_run is False. After listing
commands, detect sudo_cmds = [c for c in commands if "sudo" in c] and if
non-empty prompt the user (e.g., input("The above commands require sudo.
Proceed? [y/N]: ")) and only call self._run_removal_coordinator(software,
commands) if the user answers yes; if the user declines, print an abort message
and return a non-zero exit code. Also handle non-interactive environments (no
TTY) by refusing to run sudo commands (return non-zero) unless an explicit
--force/--execute flag is used, to avoid silent privileged execution.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cortex/cli.py (2)

931-940: Add specific return type hint.

Per coding guidelines, type hints are required. The return type list should specify the element type for better type safety and IDE support.

♻️ Proposed fix
-    def _analyze_removal_impact(self, packages: list[str]) -> list:
+    def _analyze_removal_impact(self, packages: list[str]) -> list["UninstallImpactAnalysis"]:
         """Analyze impact for all packages"""
         from cortex.uninstall_impact import UninstallImpactAnalyzer

Alternatively, import the type at the top of the file within TYPE_CHECKING block:

if TYPE_CHECKING:
    from cortex.uninstall_impact import UninstallImpactAnalysis

1003-1068: Add return type hints to display helper methods.

Several private methods are missing explicit -> None return type hints. While minor for private methods, the coding guidelines require type hints in Python code.

♻️ Methods needing `-> None` return hints
-    def _display_removal_impact(self, analyses: list) -> None:
+    def _display_removal_impact(self, analyses: list) -> None:  # OK

-    def _print_package_impact(self, analysis) -> None:
+    def _print_package_impact(self, analysis: "UninstallImpactAnalysis") -> None:

-    def _print_services(self, analysis) -> None:
+    def _print_services(self, analysis: "UninstallImpactAnalysis") -> None:

-    def _print_orphaned(self, analysis) -> None:
+    def _print_orphaned(self, analysis: "UninstallImpactAnalysis") -> None:

-    def _print_impact_summary(self, analyses: list) -> None:
+    def _print_impact_summary(self, analyses: list["UninstallImpactAnalysis"]) -> None:

-    def _print_impact_recommendations(self, analyses: list) -> None:
+    def _print_impact_recommendations(self, analyses: list["UninstallImpactAnalysis"]) -> None:
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21ad6c1 and 5c54412.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • cortex/cli.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Type hints required in Python code

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
cortex/cli.py

[error] 892-892: Ruff check failed: W293 Blank line contains whitespace in cortex/cli.py:892. Command 'ruff check . --output-format=github' exited with error.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Cortex Automation
cortex/cli.py

[error] 892-892: W293: Blank line contains whitespace.

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
cortex/cli.py

[failure] 1086-1086: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1086:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1082-1082: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1082:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1075-1075: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1075:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1073-1073: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1073:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1059-1059: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1059:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1017-1017: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1017:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 980-980: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:980:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 892-892: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:892:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint
cortex/cli.py

[failure] 1086-1086: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1086:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1082-1082: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1082:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1075-1075: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1075:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1073-1073: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1073:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1059-1059: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1059:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 1017-1017: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:1017:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 980-980: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:980:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace


[failure] 892-892: Ruff (W293)
cortex/cli.py:892:1: W293 Blank line contains whitespace

🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (3)

67-67: LGTM!

The new "Smart Uninstall" feature is properly documented in the Features table with a clear, concise description of its capabilities.


138-141: LGTM!

The usage examples for the new remove command are clear and consistent with the existing documentation style. Both --dry-run and --execute flags are demonstrated.


226-238: LGTM!

The project structure is properly updated to include the new uninstall_impact.py module with an accurate description. The test count update (36+ tests) aligns with the PR objectives.

cortex/cli.py (2)

1070-1087: LGTM!

The command generation logic is sound. Using --auto-remove with cascading and always running autoremove/autoclean for cleanup follows apt best practices.


976-1001: LGTM!

The coordinator pattern is consistent with the install method. Error handling and success/failure messaging are properly implemented.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (5)
cortex/llm_router.py (4)

123-150: Claude model parameter properly initialized.

The claude_model parameter is added to __init__ with appropriate default and the model is resolved correctly via the CLAUDE_MODELS mapping with fallback to haiku.

However, this selected model is not used in the actual API calls (see Lines 358 and 643).


338-392: Critical: Hardcoded model ignores user selection.

The _complete_claude method hardcodes "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" on Line 358, completely ignoring self.claude_model that was set based on the user's claude_model parameter. This means users who specify claude_model="haiku" to reduce costs will still be charged for Sonnet usage.

The same issue exists in _acomplete_claude at Line 643.

🔧 Fix to use selected model
     def _complete_claude(
         self,
         messages: list[dict[str, str]],
         temperature: float,
         max_tokens: int,
         tools: list[dict] | None = None,
     ) -> LLMResponse:
         """Generate completion using Claude API."""
         # Extract system message if present
         system_message = None
         user_messages = []
 
         for msg in messages:
             if msg["role"] == "system":
                 system_message = msg["content"]
             else:
                 user_messages.append(msg)
 
         # Call Claude API
         kwargs = {
-            "model": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
+            "model": self.claude_model,
             "max_tokens": max_tokens,
             "temperature": temperature,
             "messages": user_messages,
         }
 
         if system_message:
             kwargs["system"] = system_message
 
         if tools:
             # Convert OpenAI tool format to Claude format if needed
             kwargs["tools"] = tools
 
         response = self.claude_client.messages.create(**kwargs)
 
         # Extract content
         content = ""
         for block in response.content:
             if hasattr(block, "text"):
                 content += block.text
 
         # Calculate cost
         input_tokens = response.usage.input_tokens
         output_tokens = response.usage.output_tokens
         cost = self._calculate_cost(LLMProvider.CLAUDE, input_tokens, output_tokens)
 
         return LLMResponse(
             content=content,
             provider=LLMProvider.CLAUDE,
-            model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
+            model=self.claude_model,
             tokens_used=input_tokens + output_tokens,
             cost_usd=cost,
             latency_seconds=0.0,  # Set by caller
             raw_response=response.model_dump() if hasattr(response, "model_dump") else None,
         )

Apply the same fix to _acomplete_claude at Lines 620-676.


620-676: Critical: Async method also hardcodes model.

The _acomplete_claude async method has the same issue as _complete_claude - it hardcodes "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" at Line 643 instead of using self.claude_model.

Apply the same fix as suggested for _complete_claude (Lines 338-392).


95-109: Update COSTS dictionary to use Claude Haiku pricing instead of Sonnet.

The COSTS dictionary currently uses Claude 3.5 Sonnet pricing ($3.00 input, $15.00 output per 1M tokens), but since the default model is Haiku (claude_model: str = "haiku"), the costs should reflect Haiku pricing: $0.80 input and $4.00 output per 1M tokens. Update the dictionary to match:

LLMProvider.CLAUDE: {
    "input": 0.80,  # $0.80 per 1M input tokens (Haiku)
    "output": 4.0,  # $4.00 per 1M output tokens (Haiku)
},
cortex/cli.py (1)

1793-1793: Fix CI failure: Add ShellEnvironmentAnalyzer to TYPE_CHECKING imports

The pipeline is failing because ShellEnvironmentAnalyzer is not available for type checking. While the runtime import at line 1653 works, the type hint at line 1793 causes a lint error.

🔧 Proposed fix

Add to the TYPE_CHECKING imports at the top of the file:

 if TYPE_CHECKING:
     from cortex.uninstall_impact import UninstallImpactAnalysis
+    from cortex.shell_env_analyzer import ShellEnvironmentAnalyzer

This will resolve the F821 error while maintaining the lazy runtime import pattern used elsewhere in the file.

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cortex/cli.py:
- Around line 2414-2418: The --cascading flag help text is wrong; update the
remove_parser.add_argument call for "--cascading" to use a descriptive help
string that reflects cascading removal of dependents (e.g., "Cascade removal to
dependent packages" or "Also remove packages that depend on the target"), so the
CLI help correctly documents the flag's behavior for users.

In @cortex/llm/interpreter.py:
- Around line 62-64: The router is ignoring its configured claude_model because
_complete_claude and _acomplete_claude hardcode "claude-sonnet-4-20250514";
replace those hardcoded model strings in the four occurrences with
self.claude_model so the router's claude_model parameter is used (update the
methods _complete_claude and _acomplete_claude to reference self.claude_model),
and ensure self.claude_model is initialized from the CLAUDE_MODELS mapping or
the same CORTEX_USE_HAIKU env-based mechanism the interpreter uses so both
components select models consistently.
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
tests/test_llm_router.py (1)

38-59: Test coverage gap: Tests verify initialization but not runtime behavior.

These tests validate that router.claude_model is set correctly during initialization, but they don't verify that the selected model is actually used when making API calls to Claude. Since _complete_claude (line 358 in cortex/llm_router.py) hardcodes "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" instead of using self.claude_model, these tests would pass even though the model selection doesn't work at runtime.

🧪 Proposed enhancement to verify runtime model usage

Add a test that mocks the Claude API call and verifies the correct model is passed:

@patch("cortex.llm_router.Anthropic")
def test_haiku_model_used_in_api_call(self, mock_anthropic):
    """Test that Haiku model is actually used in API calls."""
    mock_content = Mock()
    mock_content.text = "Response"
    mock_response = Mock()
    mock_response.content = [mock_content]
    mock_response.usage = Mock(input_tokens=100, output_tokens=50)
    mock_response.model_dump = lambda: {}
    
    mock_client = Mock()
    mock_client.messages.create.return_value = mock_response
    mock_anthropic.return_value = mock_client
    
    router = LLMRouter(claude_api_key="test-key", claude_model="haiku")
    router.claude_client = mock_client
    
    router._complete_claude(
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
        temperature=0.7,
        max_tokens=1024
    )
    
    # Verify the correct model was used
    call_args = mock_client.messages.create.call_args
    self.assertEqual(call_args.kwargs["model"], "claude-3-5-haiku-20241022")
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (3)

489-512: Thread safety test doesn't verify concurrent write safety.

This test creates threads that all perform read operations (is_package_installed), but it doesn't verify that concurrent writes to _installed_packages or _reverse_deps_cache are thread-safe. The test would pass even without proper locking, as it only checks that threads complete without errors.

♻️ Enhanced thread safety test

To properly test thread safety, simulate concurrent cache updates:

def test_thread_safe_cache_updates(self):
    """Test that cache updates are thread-safe"""
    analyzer = UninstallImpactAnalyzer()
    results = []
    errors = []
    
    def update_cache(pkg_name):
        try:
            # Simulate concurrent cache writes
            analyzer._reverse_deps_cache[pkg_name] = [f"dep-{pkg_name}"]
            # Small delay to increase chance of race condition
            import time
            time.sleep(0.001)
            # Read back to verify
            result = analyzer._reverse_deps_cache.get(pkg_name)
            results.append((pkg_name, result))
        except Exception as e:
            errors.append(e)
    
    threads = [
        threading.Thread(target=update_cache, args=(f"pkg{i}",))
        for i in range(10)
    ]
    
    for thread in threads:
        thread.start()
    for thread in threads:
        thread.join()
    
    # Verify no errors and all updates succeeded
    self.assertEqual(len(errors), 0)
    self.assertEqual(len(results), 10)

152-161: Tests directly access private attributes instead of using public API.

The test directly sets self.analyzer._installed_packages instead of mocking the _refresh_installed_packages() method or using a public interface. While this works for unit testing, it couples tests to implementation details.

Consider mocking _refresh_installed_packages() to populate the cache through the intended code path:

@patch.object(UninstallImpactAnalyzer, "_refresh_installed_packages")
def test_is_package_installed(self, mock_refresh):
    """Test checking if package is installed"""
    # Set up cache via the refresh method
    def setup_cache():
        self.analyzer._installed_packages = {"nginx", "python3", "git"}
    mock_refresh.side_effect = setup_cache
    
    self.analyzer._refresh_installed_packages()
    
    self.assertTrue(self.analyzer.is_package_installed("nginx"))
    self.assertTrue(self.analyzer.is_package_installed("python3"))
    self.assertFalse(self.analyzer.is_package_installed("nonexistent"))

Note: If the current approach is intentional for testing internal state, you can safely ignore this suggestion.


517-526: Integration test is minimal.

The integration test only verifies that the analyzer can be instantiated and doesn't test any actual workflow. While this is acceptable for a unit test suite, consider adding more comprehensive integration tests that exercise the full analysis workflow with realistic mocked data.

Example of a more comprehensive integration test:

@patch.object(UninstallImpactAnalyzer, "_run_command")
@patch.object(UninstallImpactAnalyzer, "_refresh_installed_packages")
def test_full_workflow(self, mock_refresh, mock_run):
    """Test complete uninstall analysis workflow"""
    analyzer = UninstallImpactAnalyzer()
    analyzer._installed_packages = {"nginx", "openssl", "certbot"}
    
    # Mock apt-cache rdepends output
    def run_command_side_effect(cmd):
        if "rdepends" in cmd:
            return (True, "nginx\nReverse Depends:\n  certbot\n", "")
        elif "is-active" in cmd:
            return (True, "active\n", "")
        elif "dpkg-query" in cmd:
            return (True, "1.18.0", "")
        return (False, "", "command not found")
    
    mock_run.side_effect = run_command_side_effect
    
    # Run full analysis
    result = analyzer.analyze_uninstall_impact("nginx")
    
    # Verify comprehensive results
    self.assertTrue(result.installed)
    self.assertEqual(result.package_name, "nginx")
    self.assertGreater(len(result.directly_depends), 0)
docs/CLAUDE_HAIKU_4.5_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md (2)

53-53: Add language specification to unmarked code blocks.

Seven code blocks lack language identifiers (lines 53, 99, 401, 425, 455, 475, 712). Add language tags for proper syntax highlighting and linting compliance.

Example fixes for lines 53 and 401
-```
+```
 Latency Comparison:

For line 401, specify bash or appropriate language. Similar fixes needed for all unmarked blocks.

Also applies to: 99-99, 401-401, 425-425, 455-455, 475-475, 712-712


6-6: Wrap bare URLs in markdown link format.

Lines 6, 693-695 contain bare URLs (e.g., https://github.com/...). Per markdown standards, wrap in [link](url) format or use <url> for automatic linking.

Example fixes
-**Repository**: https://github.com/cortexlinux/cortex
+**Repository**: [cortexlinux/cortex](https://github.com/cortexlinux/cortex)

Apply similar formatting to lines 693-695.

Also applies to: 693-695

HAIKU_4.5_ENABLEMENT_SUMMARY.md (1)

187-187: Style: Add comma after year in date.

Line 187: "December 29, 2025" should be "December 29, 2025," per some style guides when used in month-day-year format.

docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md (1)

95-95: Add language specification to fenced code blocks.

Four code blocks (lines 95, 106, 173, 201) lack language identifiers. Add language tags (e.g., bash, python, text) for proper syntax highlighting.

Example fix
-```
+```bash
 cortex remove python --dry-run

Also applies to: 106-106, 173-173, 201-201

cortex/uninstall_impact.py (2)

18-19: Consider removing module-level logging.basicConfig

The logging.basicConfig() call at module level can interfere with the application's logging configuration. Since this module is imported by cortex/cli.py, which may have its own logging setup, this could override or conflict with that configuration.

♻️ Recommended approach
-logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

Let the application configure logging centrally, and this module will inherit the configuration through the logger hierarchy.


303-360: Comprehensive impact analysis with minor dataclass inconsistency

The method provides thorough analysis covering all aspects: dependencies, services, orphans, severity, and recommendations.

Note: The safe_to_remove logic (line 340) correctly sets it to False for non-installed packages, but the dataclass default is True (line 57). While not causing bugs (since this method always sets the value), the inconsistent default could be confusing.

Consider aligning the dataclass default:

-    safe_to_remove: bool = True
+    safe_to_remove: bool = False

This better reflects that packages should not be assumed safe to remove by default.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c54412 and 9f33abd.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • HAIKU_4.5_ENABLEMENT_SUMMARY.md
  • HAIKU_QUICK_REFERENCE.md
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/llm/interpreter.py
  • cortex/llm_router.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
  • docs/CLAUDE_HAIKU_4.5_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md
  • docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md
  • tests/test_interpreter.py
  • tests/test_llm_router.py
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • HAIKU_QUICK_REFERENCE.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • tests/test_interpreter.py
  • cortex/llm/interpreter.py
  • tests/test_llm_router.py
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/llm_router.py
tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Maintain >80% test coverage for pull requests

Files:

  • tests/test_interpreter.py
  • tests/test_llm_router.py
  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
**/*install*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*install*.py: Dry-run by default for all installations in command execution
No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation
Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Files:

  • tests/test_uninstall_impact.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Type hints required in Python code

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (1)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (16)
  • ImpactedPackage (23-29)
  • ServiceImpact (33-40)
  • UninstallImpactAnalysis (44-59)
  • UninstallImpactAnalyzer (62-451)
  • _run_command (103-111)
  • is_package_installed (130-133)
  • get_installed_version (135-142)
  • get_reverse_dependencies (144-183)
  • get_directly_dependent_packages (185-205)
  • get_indirectly_dependent_packages (207-238)
  • get_affected_services (240-264)
  • find_orphaned_packages (266-301)
  • _determine_severity (362-382)
  • _generate_recommendations (384-428)
  • analyze_uninstall_impact (303-360)
  • export_analysis_json (430-451)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (5)
cortex/logging_system.py (3)
  • critical (212-214)
  • info (200-202)
  • warning (204-206)
cortex/cli.py (1)
  • status (1265-1273)
cortex/sandbox/sandbox_executor.py (1)
  • success (74-76)
src/intent/context.py (1)
  • is_installed (49-50)
tests/test_shell_env_analyzer.py (2)
  • parser (94-96)
  • analyzer (106-108)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
cortex/cli.py

[error] 1793-1793: ruff check failed. F821 Undefined name 'ShellEnvironmentAnalyzer' at cortex/cli.py:1793:41.

🪛 LanguageTool
docs/CLAUDE_HAIKU_4.5_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md

[style] ~3-~3: Some style guides suggest that commas should set off the year in a month-day-year date.
Context: ...mentation Guide Date: December 29, 2025 Status: ✅ Production Ready **Ve...

(MISSING_COMMA_AFTER_YEAR)


[uncategorized] ~4-~4: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...te**: December 29, 2025 Status: ✅ Production Ready Version: 1.0 Repository: ht...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[uncategorized] ~746-~746: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...ions for Cortex Linux while maintaining high quality and backward compatibility. The 5x spee...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[uncategorized] ~748-~748: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...kage management tasks. Status: ✅ Production Ready Testing: ✅ **All 59 tests passi...

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)


[style] ~758-~758: Some style guides suggest that commas should set off the year in a month-day-year date.
Context: ...*: 1.0 Last Updated: December 29, 2025 Maintained By: Cortex Linux Team ...

(MISSING_COMMA_AFTER_YEAR)

HAIKU_4.5_ENABLEMENT_SUMMARY.md

[style] ~187-~187: Some style guides suggest that commas should set off the year in a month-day-year date.
Context: ... (Claude Sonnet 4.5) Date: December 29, 2025 Repository: https://github.com/cortexli...

(MISSING_COMMA_AFTER_YEAR)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
docs/CLAUDE_HAIKU_4.5_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md

6-6: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


53-53: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


99-99: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


401-401: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


425-425: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


455-455: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


475-475: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


693-693: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


694-694: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


695-695: Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


712-712: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md

95-95: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


106-106: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


173-173: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


201-201: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
cortex/llm_router.py (1)

89-93: Well-structured model mapping.

The CLAUDE_MODELS dictionary provides a clean abstraction for model selection. Good use of constants for maintainability.

docs/CLAUDE_HAIKU_4.5_COMPLETE_GUIDE.md (1)

1-760: ⚠️ CRITICAL: Scope mismatch — file appears unrelated to PR objectives.

This comprehensive guide documents Claude Haiku 4.5 LLM implementation, but PR objectives focus on "Uninstall Impact Analysis (Issue #113)". The Haiku feature is not mentioned in the linked issue or PR objectives at all.

Clarification needed: Is this file intended for this PR, or was it included in error? If Haiku enablement is part of this PR, please update PR description and objectives to reflect all features being delivered.

HAIKU_4.5_ENABLEMENT_SUMMARY.md (1)

1-188: ⚠️ CRITICAL: Scope mismatch — file documents unrelated Haiku LLM feature.

This summary documents Claude Haiku 4.5 enablement changes (LLM model selection), which is unrelated to the stated PR objective of "Uninstall Impact Analysis (Issue #113)". The feature is not mentioned in PR objectives or acceptance criteria.

Same clarification needed: Is this intended for this PR? If so, PR objectives require updating. If not, this file should be removed from this PR.

docs/UNINSTALL_IMPACT_ANALYSIS_SUMMARY.md (1)

1-305: ⚠️ CRITICAL: Implementation files are missing from review.

This is a summary document, not the actual implementation code. To properly review the Uninstall Impact Analysis feature, the following files must be provided:

  1. cortex/uninstall_impact.py (claimed 506 lines) — Core analyzer implementation
  2. tests/test_uninstall_impact.py (claimed 530 lines) — Test suite with 36 tests
  3. cortex/cli.py (modifications) — CLI command integration
  4. Any other modified/new files related to the feature

The summary makes specific claims about code quality, test coverage (92.11%), and functionality that cannot be verified without seeing the actual implementation code. Please provide the source files for proper code review.

cortex/cli.py (3)

29-29: LGTM: Proper TYPE_CHECKING import

Correctly uses TYPE_CHECKING to avoid circular imports while providing type hints.


882-970: Good implementation of remove workflow with proper safety measures

The method correctly implements:

  • Audit logging to installation history (lines 898, 916-918)
  • Type hints for all parameters and return type
  • Comprehensive docstring
  • Error handling with best-effort history recording
  • Safety checks before execution

Based on learnings, the audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db is properly implemented through InstallationHistory.


1119-1141: Excellent safety design: Commands require user confirmation

The removal commands correctly omit the -y flag, requiring interactive user confirmation for all sudo operations. The explicit comment documenting this design decision is helpful.

Based on learnings, this properly implements "No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation."

cortex/uninstall_impact.py (4)

22-60: Well-designed dataclasses with proper type hints

The dataclasses correctly use:

  • Type hints for all fields (per coding guidelines)
  • field(default_factory=list) for mutable defaults
  • Modern union syntax (str | None)
  • Class-level docstrings

As per coding guidelines, type hints are properly implemented.


97-134: Excellent thread-safety and secure command execution

The implementation correctly uses:

  • Threading lock for cache synchronization (lines 98, 126-128, 132-133)
  • Subprocess with timeout to prevent hanging (line 106)
  • No shell=True, preventing shell injection vulnerabilities
  • Proper exception handling for timeouts and errors

266-301: LGTM: Clear orphan detection logic

The method correctly identifies orphaned packages by checking if the target package is their only dependency. The docstring clearly explains the logic, and the implementation properly filters out critical packages.


144-183: Add type hint for package_name parameter

The parameter package_name is missing a type hint. Per coding guidelines, type hints are required in Python code.

📝 Proposed fix
-    def get_reverse_dependencies(self, package_name: str) -> list[str]:
+    def get_reverse_dependencies(self, package_name: str) -> list[str]:

Actually, checking the code again, the type hint IS present on line 144. This is correct as-is.

Looking at line 144 more carefully, the type hint is already present. Let me reconsider this.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cortex/cli.py:
- Around line 1121-1142: The removal commands currently omit the -y flag and
will hang when run non-interactively; update _generate_removal_commands to
include the -y flag on apt-get remove and apt-get autoremove (leave autoclean
as-is or add -y if it may prompt) so apt will not prompt, and add a CLI-level
confirmation prompt in _execute_removal (before calling
_run_removal_coordinator) that asks the user to confirm the package removal
(handle EOFError/KeyboardInterrupt and respect dry_run/execute flow), returning
early if the user declines; keep printing commands in dry-run mode as before.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cortex/cli.py (2)

999-1009: Consider allowing user override for high/critical severity removals.

The current logic blocks removals with high/critical severity unless --cascading is provided. While this is a good safety measure, it's inflexible - users who understand the risk cannot proceed without also enabling cascading removal (which might remove more packages than intended).

Consider prompting for explicit confirmation instead of blocking entirely, similar to the pattern in docker_permissions (lines 80-99). This would allow expert users to proceed while maintaining safety.

♻️ Alternative approach with confirmation prompt
 def _validate_removal_safety(
     self, analyses: list["UninstallImpactAnalysis"], cascading: bool
 ) -> bool:
     """Validate that removal is safe given constraints"""
     has_critical = any(a.severity in ["high", "critical"] for a in analyses)
     if has_critical and not cascading:
-        self._print_error(
-            "Cannot remove packages with high/critical impact without --cascading flag"
-        )
-        return False
+        cx_print(
+            "⚠️  Warning: Removing packages with high/critical impact may break your system!",
+            "warning"
+        )
+        try:
+            response = console.input(
+                "[bold yellow]Proceed with removal anyway? (y/N): [/bold yellow]"
+            )
+            if response.lower() not in ("y", "yes"):
+                cx_print("Removal cancelled for safety", "info")
+                return False
+        except (EOFError, KeyboardInterrupt):
+            console.print()
+            cx_print("Removal cancelled", "info")
+            return False
     return True

1137-1141: Verify autoremove behavior aligns with impact analysis.

The removal workflow automatically runs sudo apt-get autoremove and autoclean after the main removal. While this is standard practice, consider whether:

  1. The orphaned packages identified by UninstallImpactAnalyzer match what autoremove will actually remove
  2. Users should be shown which additional packages autoremove will remove before execution

The current approach is acceptable but could be enhanced by showing a preview of autoremove's planned actions, especially since the impact analysis already identifies orphaned packages.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f33abd and 938d035.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cortex/cli.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Type hints required in Python code

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
cortex/cli.py (3)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (3)
  • UninstallImpactAnalysis (44-59)
  • UninstallImpactAnalyzer (62-451)
  • analyze_uninstall_impact (303-360)
cortex/coordinator.py (2)
  • execute (230-279)
  • InstallationCoordinator (51-324)
cortex/installation_history.py (3)
  • InstallationHistory (74-632)
  • record_installation (258-316)
  • update_installation (318-367)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
cortex/cli.py (4)

31-31: LGTM - Proper use of TYPE_CHECKING for forward reference.

The TYPE_CHECKING import of UninstallImpactAnalysis correctly avoids runtime circular dependencies while enabling type hints in the removal flow.


884-972: Approve overall structure with integration of history logging.

The remove method follows the established pattern from install and correctly integrates audit logging as required. The workflow is clear: parse → analyze → validate → execute → record outcome.

The nested _record_history helper uses best-effort recording (catching exceptions) to prevent history failures from blocking removal operations, which is appropriate.

Based on learnings, this correctly implements audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for package removal operations.


2409-2420: LGTM - CLI argument parsing is well-structured.

The remove subcommand argument parsing follows the established pattern from the install command and provides clear help text. The flags (--execute, --dry-run, --cascading) are appropriate for the removal workflow with impact analysis.


973-1142: Add docstrings to helper methods.

The helper methods implementing the removal flow lack docstrings, which violates the coding guideline "Docstrings required for all public APIs." While these are private methods, they implement non-trivial logic and would benefit from documentation.

As per coding guidelines: "Docstrings required for all public APIs" - consider this applies to substantial internal methods as well.

📝 Example docstring for _generate_removal_commands
 def _generate_removal_commands(self, packages: list[str], cascading: bool) -> list[str]:
-    """Generate apt removal commands.
-
-    Note: Commands do NOT include -y flag to require interactive confirmation.
-    Users must explicitly confirm removals for safety.
-    """
+    """Generate apt removal commands for the given packages.
+
+    Args:
+        packages: List of package names to remove
+        cascading: If True, include --auto-remove flag to remove dependencies
+
+    Returns:
+        List of shell commands to execute the removal
+
+    Note:
+        Commands do NOT include -y flag to require interactive confirmation.
+        Users must explicitly confirm removals for safety.
+    """

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cortex/cli.py:
- Around line 909-929: The except block in _record_history currently swallows
all exceptions and only logs at DEBUG; change it to surface failures by logging
a WARNING with a clear message including the exception (hist_err) so
users/admins see that history write failed, while still logging full debug
details (stack trace) for diagnostics; update the except handler in
_record_history (the try/except around history.record_installation and
history.update_installation) to call logging.warning(...) with context and the
exception and also log.debug(...) or logging.exception(...) for the full
traceback.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cortex/cli.py (2)

956-965: Consider adding explicit user confirmation before removal.

While the generated commands don't include the -y flag (ensuring interactive confirmation at the sudo level), users might benefit from an explicit confirmation prompt before the removal process begins—similar to the pattern used in _sandbox_promote (lines 529-539).

💡 Example confirmation pattern

Add before line 957:

# Prompt user before executing removal
if execute and not getattr(args, 'yes', False):
    pkg_list = ', '.join(packages)
    try:
        response = console.input(
            f"[bold yellow]⚠️  Remove {pkg_list}? (y/n): [/bold yellow]"
        )
        if response.lower() not in ('y', 'yes'):
            cx_print("Removal cancelled", "info")
            _record_history("success", "User cancelled removal", packages)
            return 0
    except (EOFError, KeyboardInterrupt):
        console.print()
        cx_print("Removal cancelled", "info")
        _record_history("success", "User cancelled removal", packages)
        return 0

This would require adding a --yes flag to the remove parser (similar to sandbox promote).

Based on learnings, no silent sudo execution is allowed without explicit user confirmation.


1121-1142: Cleanup commands always included.

The method always appends autoremove and autoclean commands (lines 1139-1140), even for simple removals. While these are useful, they might confuse users who expect to see only the commands directly related to the specified package.

Consider making these cleanup steps optional or clearly separating them in the display output.

♻️ Optional improvement
-def _generate_removal_commands(self, packages: list[str], cascading: bool) -> list[str]:
+def _generate_removal_commands(self, packages: list[str], cascading: bool, cleanup: bool = True) -> list[str]:
     """Generate apt removal commands.

     Note: Commands do NOT include -y flag to require interactive confirmation.
     Users must explicitly confirm removals for safety.
     """
     commands: list[str] = []

     pkg_list = " ".join(packages)

     if cascading:
         # Remove with dependencies - requires user confirmation
         commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove --auto-remove {pkg_list}")
     else:
         # Simple removal - requires user confirmation
         commands.append(f"sudo apt-get remove {pkg_list}")

-    # Clean up commands also require confirmation
-    commands.append("sudo apt-get autoremove")
-    commands.append("sudo apt-get autoclean")
+    if cleanup:
+        # Clean up commands also require confirmation
+        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoremove")
+        commands.append("sudo apt-get autoclean")

     return commands
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5d12f0 and 1f27ca9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cortex/cli.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Type hints required in Python code

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cortex/cli.py (6)

31-31: LGTM!

The TYPE_CHECKING import for UninstallImpactAnalysis follows Python typing best practices for forward references without runtime overhead.


999-1009: Safety validation logic is clear.

The method correctly gates high/critical severity removals behind the --cascading flag. However, users might find it confusing that --cascading is required not just to remove dependencies, but to permit the removal at all.

Consider clarifying this in help text or documentation.


1054-1120: Display methods are well-structured.

The display logic is cleanly decomposed into focused helper methods with clear responsibilities. The code handles edge cases (empty lists, not installed packages) appropriately.


973-1052: Helper methods follow established patterns.

The removal helpers correctly mirror the structure used in the install method, promoting consistency across the codebase. Type hints are complete, and error handling is appropriate.


2409-2420: Argument parser properly configured.

The remove command parser follows consistent patterns with other CLI commands and includes appropriate flags for the removal workflow.


2759-2765: LGTM!

Command routing correctly passes all parsed arguments to the remove method.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 17 out of 17 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

cortex/doctor.py:103

  • The code contains duplicate check sections. Lines 74-85 are duplicated at lines 88-103, causing the same diagnostic checks to run twice. This creates unnecessary overhead and confusing output for users running system diagnostics.
            # Python & Dependencies
            self._print_section("Python & Dependencies")
            self._check_python()
            self._check_dependencies()

            self._print_section("GPU & Acceleration")
            self._check_gpu_driver()
            self._check_cuda()

            self._print_section("AI & Services")
            self._check_ollama()
            self._check_api_keys()

            # System Info (includes API provider and security features)
            self._print_section("System Configuration")
            self._check_api_keys()
            self._check_security_tools()

            # Python & Dependencies
            self._print_section("Python & Dependencies")
            self._check_python()
            self._check_dependencies()

            self._print_section("GPU & Acceleration")
            self._check_gpu_driver()
            self._check_cuda()

            self._print_section("AI & Services")
            self._check_ollama()


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

RIVALHIDE and others added 2 commits January 9, 2026 17:20
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @cortex/uninstall_impact.py:
- Around line 134-142: Add a docstring to the public method
get_installed_version(package_name: str) describing the parameter
(package_name), the return value (str version or None), and the behavior
(returns None if package not installed or command fails; otherwise returns the
stripped version string retrieved via dpkg-query). Keep it concise, follow
project docstring style (one-line summary plus param/return details), and place
it directly above the method definition.
- Around line 61-62: The class UninstallImpactAnalyzer is missing a class-level
docstring; add a comprehensive docstring to the UninstallImpactAnalyzer class
that briefly describes its purpose (analyzing the impact of uninstalling
packages), intended usage, main responsibilities, and the key public methods
(e.g., analyze, summarize_impact, get_affected_packages or whatever public APIs
exist) including expected inputs and return types and any raised exceptions;
place this docstring immediately below the class declaration so tools and users
of the public API see it.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
cortex/uninstall_impact.py (4)

17-18: Remove root logger configuration from library code.

Library modules should not configure the root logger with logging.basicConfig(). This overrides any logging configuration set by the application using this module. Remove these lines and let the application (CLI) configure logging as needed.

♻️ Proposed fix
-logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

239-263: Consider extracting critical services as a class constant.

The critical_services set on line 251 is hardcoded within the method. For consistency with the class design (which uses CRITICAL_PACKAGES as a class constant), consider moving this to a class-level constant like CRITICAL_SERVICES. This improves maintainability and makes it easier for users to customize the list.

♻️ Proposed refactor

Add at class level (after CRITICAL_PACKAGES):

    # Critical services that should not be disrupted
    CRITICAL_SERVICES = {"ssh", "docker", "postgresql", "mysql"}

Then update the method:

     def get_affected_services(self, package_name: str) -> list[ServiceImpact]:
         """Get system services that depend on this package"""
         affected = []
 
         for service_name, packages in self.SERVICE_PACKAGE_MAP.items():
             if package_name in packages:
                 # Try to get service status
                 success, status_out, _ = self._run_command(["systemctl", "is-active", service_name])
 
                 status = "active" if success and "active" in status_out else "inactive"
 
                 # Check if service is critical
-                critical_services = {"ssh", "docker", "postgresql", "mysql"}
-                is_critical = service_name in critical_services
+                is_critical = service_name in self.CRITICAL_SERVICES

265-300: Orphan detection heuristic may have false positives.

The current orphan detection (lines 297-298) considers a package orphaned if its only dependency is the package being removed. However, this doesn't account for packages that were explicitly installed by the user (as opposed to auto-installed as dependencies). Consider enhancing this logic to check if packages were auto-installed.

You can verify auto-installed status with:

apt-mark showauto <package>

This would reduce false positives by only marking auto-installed packages as orphans.

♻️ Enhanced detection approach
             # Package is only orphaned if its ONLY dependency is the one being removed
+            # AND it was auto-installed (not manually installed by user)
             if len(actual_deps) == 1 and actual_deps[0] == package_name:
-                orphaned.append(dep_name)
+                # Check if package was auto-installed
+                auto_check, stdout, _ = self._run_command(["apt-mark", "showauto", dep_name])
+                if auto_check and dep_name in stdout:
+                    orphaned.append(dep_name)

447-448: Specify file encoding explicitly.

When opening files for writing, explicitly specify encoding='utf-8' to ensure consistent behavior across different platforms and locale settings.

♻️ Proposed fix
-        with open(filepath, "w") as f:
+        with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
             json.dump(analysis_dict, f, indent=2)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f27ca9 and 398adc3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.py: Follow PEP 8 style guide
Type hints required in Python code
Docstrings required for all public APIs

Files:

  • cortex/cli.py
  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
**/*install*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*install*.py: Dry-run by default for all installations in command execution
No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation
Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Files:

  • cortex/uninstall_impact.py
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : Implement audit logging to ~/.cortex/history.db for all package operations

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Type hints required in Python code

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
📚 Learning: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: cortexlinux/cortex PR: 0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-11T12:03:24.071Z
Learning: Applies to **/*install*.py : No silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation

Applied to files:

  • cortex/cli.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cortex/cli.py (1)

1116-1138: Good: Commands require explicit user confirmation.

The removal commands correctly omit the -y flag, ensuring users must interactively confirm each removal operation. This follows the coding guideline of "no silent sudo execution - require explicit user confirmation."

Based on coding guidelines.

@mikejmorgan-ai mikejmorgan-ai self-assigned this Jan 10, 2026
@RIVALHIDE RIVALHIDE changed the title Issue: 113 : Implement Uninstall Impact Analysis with Dependency and Service Impact Detection feat(uninstall): implement impact analysis with dependency and service detection Jan 12, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Package Uninstall Impact Analysis

5 participants