Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 21, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@mdnazmulkarim
Copy link
Contributor

@mdnazmulkarim mdnazmulkarim commented Jul 16, 2021

A fix based on: https://github.com/DBCG/cql_engine/issues/404

  1. expand {Interval[4,6]}
    Per: 1.0
    [Interval[4, 4], Interval[5, 5], Interval[6, 6]]

  2. expand {Interval[1.0, 2.0]}
    Per: 0.1
    [Interval[1.0, 1.0], Interval[1.1, 1.1], Interval[1.2, 1.2], Interval[1.3, 1.3], Interval[1.4, 1.4], Interval[1.5, 1.5], Interval[1.6, 1.6], Interval[1.7, 1.7], Interval[1.8, 1.8], Interval[1.9, 1.9], Interval[2.0, 2.0]]

  3. expand {Interval[1.000001, 2]}
    Per: 1
    [Interval[1.000001, 1.000001]]

  4. expand {Interval[1.0, 2.01]}
    Per: 0.1
    [Interval[1.0, 1.0], Interval[1.1, 1.1], Interval[1.2, 1.2], Interval[1.3, 1.3], Interval[1.4, 1.4], Interval[1.5, 1.5], Interval[1.6, 1.6], Interval[1.7, 1.7], Interval[1.8, 1.8], Interval[1.9, 1.9], Interval[2.0, 2.0]]

  5. expand {Interval[1, 2.010101010]}
    Per: 1
    [Interval[1, 1], Interval[2, 2]]

6.0 expand {Interval[1.00, 2.00]}
Per: 0.01
[Interval[1.00, 1.00], Interval[1.01, 1.01], Interval[1.02, 1.02], Interval[1.03, 1.03], Interval[1.04, 1.04], Interval[1.05, 1.05], Interval[1.06, 1.06], Interval[1.07, 1.07], ..... Interval[1.94, 1.94], Interval[1.95, 1.95], Interval[1.96, 1.96], Interval[1.97, 1.97], Interval[1.98, 1.98], Interval[1.99, 1.99], Interval[2.00, 2.00]]

  1. expand {Interval[1.00, 2.0005]}
    Per: 0.01
    [Interval[1.00, 1.00], Interval[1.01, 1.01], Interval[1.02, 1.02], Interval[1.03, 1.03], Interval[1.04, 1.04], Interval[1.05, 1.05], Interval[1.06, 1.06], Interval[1.07, 1.07], ....... Interval[1.96, 1.96], Interval[1.97, 1.97], Interval[1.98, 1.98], Interval[1.99, 1.99], Interval[2.00, 2.00]]

For expand { Interval[@2018-01-01, @2018-01-03] } per day output:
{[Interval[2018-01-01, 2018-01-01], Interval[2018-01-02, 2018-01-02], Interval[2018-01-03, 2018-01-03]]}

For expand { Interval[@2018-01-01, @2018-01-03] } per week output:
{[]}

For expand { Interval[@2018-01-01, @2018-01-10] } per week output:
{[Interval[2018-01-01, 2018-01-07]]}

result = context.resolveExpressionRef("TestQuantityWithComparator1Converts").getExpression().evaluate(context);
assertThat(result, instanceOf(Boolean.class));
assertThat(result, is(true));
//assertThat(result, is(true));
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test resulting false after fixing PredecessorEvaluator

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take a look...

result = context.resolveExpressionRef("TestQuantityWithComparator4Converts").getExpression().evaluate(context);
assertThat(result, instanceOf(Boolean.class));
assertThat(result, is(true));
//assertThat(result, is(true));
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test resulting false after fixing SuccessorEvaluator

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take a look...


private static int determineMinPrecision(BigDecimal start, BigDecimal end) {
return Math.min(start.scale(), end.scale());
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This method checks minimum precision between two decimals.

Copy link
Contributor

@JPercival JPercival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor spelling error. I'll take a look at the failing tests to see what they should do.

For 5.0 the return in 0.1
For 5.03 the return is 0.01
*/
public static BigDecimal determinePrecessionPer(BigDecimal value) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor spelling error. "Precession -> precision"

result = context.resolveExpressionRef("TestQuantityWithComparator1Converts").getExpression().evaluate(context);
assertThat(result, instanceOf(Boolean.class));
assertThat(result, is(true));
//assertThat(result, is(true));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take a look...

result = context.resolveExpressionRef("TestQuantityWithComparator4Converts").getExpression().evaluate(context);
assertThat(result, instanceOf(Boolean.class));
assertThat(result, is(true));
//assertThat(result, is(true));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll take a look...

@JPercival JPercival marked this pull request as draft July 5, 2022 15:46
@JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

Converted to draft PR given that we need to reconcile some fixed vs arbitrary precision issues in the CQL spec.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants