Skip to content

Conversation

@dev-parkins
Copy link
Owner

  • Created RUSTDOC_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md in docs/planning/v0.0.5/
  • Analyzed current documentation coverage (~25% across crates)
  • Defined 4-phase implementation strategy (2-3 weeks, 62 hours)
  • Established documentation standards and templates
  • Included future enhancements (JSON export for AI integration)
  • References attached RUSTDOC_RESEARCH.md for AI integration guidance

Phases:

  1. Foundation Setup - Workspace config, CI integration (8h)
  2. Compiler Documentation - All compiler crate APIs (27h)
  3. Runtime & Godot Docs - Runtime and binding APIs (19h)
  4. Validation & CI - Link checking, example testing (8h)

Success criteria: 80%+ coverage, all examples compile, CI enforcement

Description

Related Issues

  • Closes #
  • Fixes #
  • Relates to #

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 📝 Documentation update
  • 🧪 Test improvement
  • ♻️ Code refactoring (no functional changes)
  • 🎨 Style/formatting changes
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • 🔧 Build/tooling changes

Changes Made

Testing

  • All existing tests pass (cargo test)
  • Added new tests for new functionality
  • Manual testing completed (describe below)

Manual Testing Details:

# Commands you ran to test
cargo build
cargo test
cargo run --bin rustyscript_runtime examples/your-example.ferris

Code Quality

  • Code formatted with cargo fmt
  • No clippy warnings (cargo clippy)
  • Documentation updated (if applicable)
  • CHANGELOG.md updated (if applicable)
  • Examples updated or added (if applicable)

Screenshots / Output

Before:

<!-- Paste output or add screenshot -->

After:

<!-- Paste output or add screenshot -->

Breaking Changes

  • This PR introduces breaking changes

Migration Guide:

Additional Notes

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guide
  • I have followed the code style guidelines
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits specification

Notes to Reviewers


Thank You

Thank you for contributing to FerrisScript! 🦀

- Created RUSTDOC_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md in docs/planning/v0.0.5/
- Analyzed current documentation coverage (~25% across crates)
- Defined 4-phase implementation strategy (2-3 weeks, 62 hours)
- Established documentation standards and templates
- Included future enhancements (JSON export for AI integration)
- References attached RUSTDOC_RESEARCH.md for AI integration guidance

Phases:
1. Foundation Setup - Workspace config, CI integration (8h)
2. Compiler Documentation - All compiler crate APIs (27h)
3. Runtime & Godot Docs - Runtime and binding APIs (19h)
4. Validation & CI - Link checking, example testing (8h)

Success criteria: 80%+ coverage, all examples compile, CI enforcement
@dev-parkins dev-parkins marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2025 07:02
@dev-parkins dev-parkins merged commit a69ab92 into main Oct 14, 2025
8 checks passed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@dev-parkins dev-parkins deleted the docs/rustdoc-implementation-plan branch October 14, 2025 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants