Add Docker Compose setup and AI review workflow

[gouravjshah]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

logging to /home/runner/.local/share/goose/sessions/20250921_100001.jsonl
working directory: /home/runner/work/tech-stack-advisor/tech-stack-advisor

docker-compose.yaml

• Removed an empty line at the end of the file
• Added an empty line at the end of the file

[github-actions]

logging to /home/runner/.local/share/goose/sessions/20250921_100311.jsonl
working directory: /home/runner/work/tech-stack-advisor/tech-stack-advisor

```.github/workflows/ci.yml`

• Removed pull request branch trigger
  ```docker-compose.yaml`
• Removed an empty line at the end of the file

[github-actions]

🤖 AI Code Review

Automated review by Goose + Google Gemini

logging to /home/runner/.local/share/goose/sessions/20250921_100937.jsonl
working directory: /home/runner/work/tech-stack-advisor/tech-stack-advisor

Okay, I will review the changes with a focus on the areas you specified.

.github/workflows/ci.yml

• Summary of changes: Removed the pull request trigger for the main branch.
• Key observations: This change means that the CI pipeline will no longer run automatically on pull requests targeting the main branch.
• Recommendations for improvement: Consider whether this was intentional. If PR checks are desired, re-add the pull_request trigger. It's generally good practice to run CI on all PRs.
• Security or performance notes: N/A

.github/workflows/goose-pr-review.yml

• Summary of changes: Modified the Goose PR review workflow to use a dedicated instructions file and improve the output formatting of the AI review comment.
• Key observations: The workflow now reads instructions from .goose/instructions.txt, which allows for easier modification and maintenance of the review criteria. The output formatting is improved for better readability in the PR comment.
• Recommendations for improvement: Consider adding error handling in case changes.txt is empty.
• Security or performance notes: Ensure that the GOOGLE_API_KEY secret is properly secured.

.goose/instructions.txt

• Summary of changes: Added a new file containing detailed instructions for the Goose AI code review process.
• Key observations: This file provides a structured and comprehensive guide for the AI review, covering various aspects of the codebase and desired review format.
• Recommendations for improvement: Ensure the instructions are kept up-to-date with the evolving project requirements.
• Security or performance notes: N/A

docker-compose.yaml

• Summary of changes: Added Redis and Nginx services to the Docker Compose configuration.
• Key observations: The docker-compose.yaml file now includes services for Redis (for data persistence) and Nginx (for reverse proxy and load balancing). A volume is created for Redis data.
• Recommendations for improvement: Consider using environment variables for configurable settings like Redis port. The Nginx configuration should ideally support HTTPS.
• Security or performance notes: Ensure appropriate resource limits are set for each service in production.

nginx.conf

• Summary of changes: Added a new Nginx configuration file to handle reverse proxying and load balancing for the tech-stack-advisor service.
• Key observations: The Nginx configuration file sets up a reverse proxy to the tech-stack-advisor service, forwarding requests and setting appropriate headers. A health check endpoint is also defined.
• Recommendations for improvement: Add TLS/SSL configuration for HTTPS support. Consider adding rate limiting and other security measures.
• Security or performance notes: Ensure that the Nginx configuration is properly secured and optimized for production use.

Overall Assessment:

• Rate: Good
• Main strengths:
  • The introduction of .goose/instructions.txt for the AI review workflow makes it easier to customize and maintain the review process.
  • The addition of Redis and Nginx services to the Docker Compose configuration enhances the application's scalability and data persistence capabilities.
• Priority improvements:
  • Add HTTPS support to the Nginx configuration.
  • Re-evaluate the removal of the pull request trigger from the CI pipeline and consider re-adding it.
• Production readiness assessment:
  • The changes improve the application's architecture and CI/CD process but require additional security hardening and optimization before being deployed to production. Specifically, HTTPS should be enabled, and resource limits should be configured for the services.

I also noticed that you are trying to use Goose in your CI/CD workflow. I would suggest you enable the search_available_extensions to explore options. You may find tools to make the integration with GitHub actions easier, and to use the LLM more effectively.

---

This review was automatically generated. Use human judgment for final decisions.