Skip to content

Conversation

@cha0sg0d
Copy link

@cha0sg0d cha0sg0d commented Oct 6, 2022

No description provided.

@cha0sg0d cha0sg0d requested a review from 0xhank October 6, 2022 03:17
@cha0sg0d cha0sg0d force-pushed the cha0s/getter-facet-room branch from 16b435b to e0442a0 Compare October 6, 2022 03:41
@0xhank
Copy link

0xhank commented Oct 6, 2022

why are you putting these getters here instead of getterfacet2? we are going to need to add more getters as we continue to build, where do you see those functions going?

@cha0sg0d
Copy link
Author

cha0sg0d commented Oct 6, 2022

why are you putting these getters here instead of getterfacet2? we are going to need to add more getters as we continue to build, where do you see those functions going?

Ideally getters are specific to their functionality. Like the DFArtifact facet should handle all thing artifacts. So we can start to break up the getters into their component pieces. If we have new getters that don't relate to Artifacts or Spaceships, they can go in DFGetters for now bc we made more space

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants