Skip to content

Conversation

@yanglbme
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 29, 2025 13:58
@idoocs idoocs added cpp Issues or Pull requests relate to .cpp code go Issues or Pull requests relate to .go code core team Issues or pull requests from core team java Issues or Pull requests relate to .java code json Issues or Pull requests relate to .json files md Issues or Pull requests relate to .md files py Issues or Pull requests relate to .py code ts Issues or Pull requests relate to .ts code labels Dec 29, 2025
@yanglbme yanglbme merged commit 0aed8a5 into main Dec 29, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@yanglbme yanglbme deleted the dev branch December 29, 2025 13:59
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds solutions for LeetCode problem #3792 "Sum of Increasing Product Blocks" to the repository. The problem is marked as a premium (🔒) medium-difficulty problem.

  • Adds a new entry for problem 3792 to both English and Chinese solution index files
  • Includes a minor formatting change to a comment line in the root README

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
solution/README_EN.md Adds entry for problem 3792 in the English solution index with proper metadata (problem number, title, difficulty, and premium status)
solution/README.md Adds entry for problem 3792 in the Chinese solution index with corresponding Chinese title
README.md Contains an unrelated minor formatting change to a comment line (removing the dash prefix)

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

| 3790 | [最小全 1 倍数](/solution/3700-3799/3790.Smallest%20All-Ones%20Multiple/README.md) | | 中等 | 第 482 场周赛 |
| 3791 | [给定范围内平衡整数的数目](/solution/3700-3799/3791.Number%20of%20Balanced%20Integers%20in%20a%20Range/README.md) | | 困难 | 第 482 场周赛 |
| 3792 | [递增乘积块之和](/solution/3700-3799/3792.Sum%20of%20Increasing%20Product%20Blocks/README.md) | | 中等 | 🔒 |

Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a line numbering inconsistency between the English and Chinese solution README files. In README_EN.md, the new entry for problem 3792 is on line 3803, but in README.md (Chinese version), it's on line 3805. These should be aligned to maintain consistency across both files. The line numbers should match between corresponding entries in both language versions of the solution README.

Suggested change

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
- [位 1 的个数](/solution/0100-0199/0191.Number%20of%201%20Bits/README.md) - `位运算``lowbit`
- [合并区间](/solution/0000-0099/0056.Merge%20Intervals/README.md) - `区间合并`
<!-- 排序算法、待补充 -->
<!-- 排序算法、待补充 -->
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change appears to be unintentional - it removes the dash prefix from a comment line without adding any new content. This is unrelated to adding the solution for problem 3792. The line should retain its original formatting as "- " to maintain consistency with the rest of the bullet list structure in this section.

Suggested change
<!-- 排序算法、待补充 -->
- <!-- 排序算法、待补充 -->

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core team Issues or pull requests from core team cpp Issues or Pull requests relate to .cpp code go Issues or Pull requests relate to .go code java Issues or Pull requests relate to .java code json Issues or Pull requests relate to .json files md Issues or Pull requests relate to .md files py Issues or Pull requests relate to .py code ts Issues or Pull requests relate to .ts code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants