Skip to content

Conversation

@priyankatiwari08
Copy link
Contributor

Ports #3749 to release/6.1 branch

Closes #3848

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 15, 2025 14:54
@priyankatiwari08 priyankatiwari08 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 15, 2025 14:54
@priyankatiwari08 priyankatiwari08 added this to the 6.0.5 milestone Dec 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 16, 2025 10:51
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj:278

  • The test file SqlDataAdapterBatchUpdateTests.cs is included twice in the project file. The first inclusion at line 16 is within a conditional ItemGroup for Always Encrypted tests, while the second inclusion at line 278 is in an unconditional ItemGroup. This duplication will cause build warnings or errors. Remove one of these duplicate entries - preferably keep only the conditional one at line 16 since this is an Always Encrypted test.
    <Compile Include="DataCommon\AADUtility.cs" />

src/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient/tests/ManualTests/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.ManualTesting.Tests.csproj:392

  • This empty Folder ItemGroup appears to be unnecessary. The folder path 'microsoft.data.sqlclient\tests\manualtests\alwaysencrypted' seems incorrectly cased and doesn't provide any functional value. Modern SDK-style projects automatically include folders based on their file contents. Consider removing this ItemGroup.

apoorvdeshmukh
apoorvdeshmukh previously approved these changes Dec 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@apoorvdeshmukh apoorvdeshmukh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test needs to be fixed in main first and then changes need to be ported here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants