Docker healthcheck

[mdellabitta]

Important

Adds Docker healthcheck and updates dependencies, removing an unused import in TestIds.scala.

• Docker Healthcheck:
  • Adds HEALTHCHECK command to Dockerfile using curl to check /health endpoint.
• Dependencies:
  • Updates versions of @aws-sdk/client-s3, @aws-sdk/client-sqs, @aws-sdk/s3-request-presigner, and @sentry/cli in package.json.
• Misc:
  • Removes unused import scala.util.control.Breaks._ from TestIds.scala.

^{This description was created by for e3d1a84. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 4ed13e1 in 41 seconds

More details

• Looked at 58 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. Dockerfile:12

• Draft comment:
  The HEALTHCHECK command should use CMD-SHELL to ensure it runs correctly in a shell environment.

HEALTHCHECK CMD-SHELL node dist/src/docker-healthcheck.js

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The current CMD syntax using JSON array format is actually the preferred way in Dockerfiles as it doesn't invoke a shell, making it more efficient and predictable. CMD-SHELL would add an unnecessary shell layer. The current syntax will work fine for running a Node.js script. There's no clear evidence that CMD-SHELL is needed here.
  Maybe there's something specific about the healthcheck script that requires shell features? The comment might know something about the implementation details that we don't.
  Without seeing the healthcheck script contents or any evidence that shell features are needed, we should stick with the more direct CMD syntax which is working and follows Docker best practices.
  Delete this comment as it suggests a change that isn't necessary and could potentially be worse than the current implementation.

Workflow ID: wflow_4M4HN2fSfvxy0tnW

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9b6e119 in 23 seconds

More details

• Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. src/docker-healthcheck.ts:21

• Draft comment:
  Using process.exit() can be abrupt and may not allow for proper cleanup. Consider handling exits more gracefully, possibly using a cleanup function or ensuring all resources are properly released before exiting. This applies to other process.exit() calls as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

Workflow ID: wflow_nX2D5QunoFHC3OTu

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on e3d1a84 in 8 seconds

More details

• Looked at 94 lines of code in 3 files
• Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. Dockerfile:4

• Draft comment:
  Consider using apt autoremove after apt clean to remove unnecessary packages and free up space.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The Dockerfile uses apt clean which only removes the package cache. To free up more space, apt autoremove should also be used to remove unnecessary packages.

2. Dockerfile:14

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a --max-time option to the curl command in the HEALTHCHECK to specify a timeout and avoid hanging indefinitely.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The HEALTHCHECK command in the Dockerfile should specify a timeout to avoid hanging indefinitely if the service is unresponsive.

Workflow ID: wflow_dRDnsPx3yUlaeb1o

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud