Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to cc2f17e in 21 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
15lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/node.js.yml:29
- Draft comment:
Updated the SonarQube Scan action version to v5.3.1. Ensure that this new version’s configuration (inputs/outputs) remains compatible with our current setup. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is related to a dependency change, specifically updating the SonarQube Scan action version. It asks the PR author to ensure compatibility, which violates the rule against asking the author to ensure things are tested or verified. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
2. .github/workflows/node.js.yml:33
- Draft comment:
A trailing newline was added. Good practice for consistent file formatting. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_JobZ7R2aOuDteBy3
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/node.js.yml (2)
29-29: Upgrade looks good; consider pinning to a commit SHA for supply-chain safety.Tag-only references can be retagged. Pin to the release commit and keep the human-readable tag as a comment.
Apply:
- uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@v5.3.1 + uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@<commit-sha-for-v5.3.1> # v5.3.1
31-33: Add minimal permissions, skip forks without secrets, and (optionally) surface SONAR_HOST_URL.
- Limit GITHUB_TOKEN scope for PR decoration.
- Avoid failures on external fork PRs where secrets aren’t available.
- If you don’t set sonar.host.url in sonar-project.properties, expose SONAR_HOST_URL here.
Apply:
build: - - runs-on: ubuntu-latest + permissions: + contents: read + pull-requests: read + runs-on: ubuntu-latest @@ - - name: SonarQube Scan + - name: SonarQube Scan + if: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' || github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository }} uses: SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@v5.3.1 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed to get PR information, if any SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }} + # SONAR_HOST_URL: ${{ secrets.SONAR_HOST_URL }} # if not set in sonar-project.properties
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/node.js.yml(1 hunks)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 03511f3 in 24 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/node.js.yml:25
- Draft comment:
Removed SonarQube scan step. If updating the scanner was intended, ensure the new configuration is applied so code scanning isn’t inadvertently disabled. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to ensure that the new configuration is applied, which violates the rule against asking the author to ensure something. It also seems to be more of a cautionary note rather than a specific suggestion or question about the code.
Workflow ID: wflow_bm2dzY8iou9jeHag
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
WalkthroughRemoved the SonarQube Scan step and its environment variables from the Node.js CI GitHub Actions workflow; all other steps remain unchanged. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub
participant Runner as Actions Runner
Dev->>GH: Push/PR
GH->>Runner: Trigger Node.js CI
Runner->>Runner: Checkout repo
Runner->>Runner: Setup Node.js
Runner->>Runner: npm ci
Runner->>Runner: npm run build
Runner->>Runner: npm test
note over Runner: SonarQube scan step removed
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Removed sonar scanning build step due to security vulnerability.
Summary by CodeRabbit