To detect, for each disease endpoint, whether there is a significant increase in prevalence in 1998 likely due to introduction of outpatient register
-
Because many disease outcomes are missed before 1998:
- Analyses that consider age at onset are not trustable
- Bias is introduced due to swift change in prevalence
-
Dataset:
- Nationwide Finnish health registry data (~ 5.7 Million individuals)
- Construct the same definitions of the FinnGen endpoints
For each disease,
- Covariates:
- event year
- age
- “discontinuation indicator”: 1 if the event year falls into 1999-2001; 0 if the event year falls into 1995-1997
- Output: prevalence of the disease
- Time frame: 1986 - 2011
Our model accurately identify endpoints with significant prevalence increase in 1998
Percentage of endpoints having a significant prevalence increase in 1998 is 70.6%
Percentage of endpoints with a significant prevalence increase in Neoplasms - �benign neoplasms vs malignant neoplasms: 60.1% vs 2.4%.
Reassuring results because Malignant neoplasm are well covered by the cancer register since the 70’s.
- https://risteys.finngen.fi
- An example:





