Skip to content

Conversation

@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech force-pushed the aschemmel-tech-baselibs-arc-inspect branch from 582a440 to 8ad620e Compare December 1, 2025 10:59
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 11:00
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2025 11:00
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech requested a review from 4og December 1, 2025 11:00
masc2023
masc2023 previously approved these changes Dec 1, 2025
@aschemmel-tech
Copy link
Contributor Author

please do not merge before 4og's review

@4og
Copy link
Member

4og commented Dec 2, 2025

I'll check this PR shortly

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. It will be closed in 10 days if no further activity occurs. #magic___^_^___line

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jan 2, 2026
@FScholPer FScholPer removed the Stale label Jan 2, 2026
Comment on lines +112 to +113
- NO
- As the functionalities are quite small, timing should not be a problem. Maybe with the exception of JSON - add a AoU here?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you clarify why it's marked NO?
I’m not aware of any timing requirements for Baselibs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants