[ total ] Make getters TCInline & add a test for getters producing a smaller value#31
Open
buzden wants to merge 1 commit intoedwinb:mainfrom
Open
[ total ] Make getters TCInline & add a test for getters producing a smaller value#31buzden wants to merge 1 commit intoedwinb:mainfrom
buzden wants to merge 1 commit intoedwinb:mainfrom
Conversation
buzden
force-pushed
the
record-smaller
branch
from
682eac6 to
f83f88f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I rebased this to the current |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When I run into this behaviour in the current Idris I thought the reason is lack of
%tcinlinefor the getter functions. I added it there and it still is not working. Then I thought this is because of the way howcases and pattern matches are elaborated. Then I decided to try this in Yaffle and I realised that it also has this problem, somewhy. Even if the getter-like function is defined using explicitcaseclause.