rfc: AI Tool Policy #26
Conversation
erickzhao
left a comment
erickzhao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wholeheartedly agree with the ethos of this policy.
While reading through this RFC, TIL of git interpret-trailers as well.
|
|
||
| We encourage disclosure of AI tool assistance in code contributions. This practice helps facilitate productive code reviews, and is not used to police tool usage. | ||
|
|
||
| When AI tools meaningfully assist in your contribution, note it in the commit message with a [trailer](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-interpret-trailers): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're defining rules for agents, does this mean that there should be some kind of Claude Code attribution setting we can add to the .claude folder in Electron core?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Claude Code should default to attributing itself to commits generated with CC. If users commit manually there's not a lot you can do other than just eyeball it (and have this in the policy)
MarshallOfSound
left a comment
MarshallOfSound
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems fine and reasonable to me all round. I'm interested in what enforcement looks like and what we can do to force people to read this policy.
E.g. Link it in the PR template and auto-close any third-party PR that hasn't explicitly checked that box (we can even cheat and "prompt" any model reading the PR template to never check that box by itself in an html comment or something)
4 participants
This RFC proposes an official policy on AI-assisted contributions to Electron. The goals are to:
📄 Read the rendered RFC & Policy