Skip to content

Conversation

@lighterabc
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@lighterabc lighterabc self-assigned this Dec 24, 2025
@lighterabc lighterabc changed the title Add sig fuzz tests Add signature and int fuzz tests Dec 24, 2025
@lighterabc lighterabc merged commit 85249ac into main Dec 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@lighterabc lighterabc deleted the fuzz_test_sig branch December 24, 2025 15:48
for i := 0; i < len(b); i += 8 {
var chunk [8]byte
copy(chunk[:], b[i:min(i+8, len(b))])
msgBytes = append(msgBytes, g.GoldilocksField(binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(chunk[:])))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would g.GoldilocksField(binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(chunk[:])) fail because of non-canonical form?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no goldilocks field can work in non-canonical form too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants