Skip to content

fix: excessive complexity comparing types error on VTEX schema#695

Merged
victorcg88 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/excessive-complexity-comparing-types
Jan 23, 2026
Merged

fix: excessive complexity comparing types error on VTEX schema#695
victorcg88 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/excessive-complexity-comparing-types

Conversation

@victorcg88
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request template

Describe the purpose of the change, the specific changes done in detail, and the issue you have fixed.

Motivation and context

  • Dependencies. If any, specify:
  • Open issue. If applicable, link:

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that causes existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Change requires a documentation update

What is the destination branch of this PR?

  • Main
  • Other. Specify:

How has this been tested?

Tests performed according to testing guidelines:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review on my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • My changes generate no new warnings.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.

@victorcg88 victorcg88 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 10:41
@github-actions
Copy link

Check PR 695 preview 👀

https://x.test.empathy.co/preview/695/index.html

@victorcg88 victorcg88 merged commit 18fec5d into main Jan 23, 2026
4 checks passed
@victorcg88 victorcg88 deleted the fix/excessive-complexity-comparing-types branch January 23, 2026 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants