Skip to content

Conversation

@MEM2677
Copy link
Member

@MEM2677 MEM2677 commented Jan 30, 2026

No description provided.

@MEM2677 MEM2677 requested a review from ffalqui January 30, 2026 10:24
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Questo non l'ho capito

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risolto, in effetti non c'era nessuno a raccogliere l'eccezione asincrona

Copy link

@ffalqui ffalqui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Vanno aggiornati i job cache alla v4 in pipeline

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

il limite 1000 secondo te potrebbe dare problemi? stiamo dicendo che possiamo accodare massimo 1000 esecuzioni asicrone di versioning, corretto?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Esatto! Il meccanismo della coda esiste perché fare un thread separato per ogni versionamento è spreco di CPU e non robusto dal pdv enterprise. Le operazioni su disco sono abbastanza veloci, a meno di non trovarsi su un file system ad alte prestazioni è assai difficile trovare più di pochi elementi in coda, mi sono tenuto assai largo

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

Copy link

@ffalqui ffalqui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

verificare metodo VersioningManager.processDeferredVersioning, potrebbe essere fragile

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@MEM2677 MEM2677 merged commit 6670906 into release/6.5 Feb 11, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

Requested publication of version 6.5.2-ESB-827-PR-79

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants