Graceful error handling for host function calls #73
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
Hey team, just wondering if you've come up with an idiomatic solution for guest error handling of fallible host function calls yet? I'm still using this patch in production. Based on our metrics, we've executed around 1.8 billion guest modules since December with these changes and it's been quite reliable for us. |
Contributor
|
Hey, thanks for the update and glad to hear things have been going well! This isn't something we're currently considering, although I believe something similar could be achieved with host functions and might make a good addition to an extism extension library we've been discussing building. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See extism/go-sdk#89