Ajust readme to add more credit and credibility

[eeveeyynaerlge]

lol as seen above

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README with additional project information and credits.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Two lines were added to README.md following the introductory sentence: an attribution crediting the creator and their other projects, and a humorous commentary about the operating system. These are purely documentation additions with no code modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation Updates README.md	Added two new lines: creator attribution ("Made by Facedev...") and a humorous endorsement ("If you actually read this...")

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A README grows with a touch so light,
Two lines of wit, a creator's delight,
"Trust me bro," the rabbit did say,
Documentation shines in a whimsical way! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "Ajust readme to add more credit and credibility" is partially related to the changeset. The title accurately reflects that the README was adjusted and that credit was added, which aligns with the first line added to the README ("Made by Facedev, the person behind Bliptext, Fextify and Vyntr"). However, the claim about adding "credibility" is somewhat overstated, as the second line added ("If you actually read this, this os is amazing trust me bro") is informal and conversational rather than genuinely adding credibility. Despite this minor overstatement, the title captures the primary intent of the change and provides enough clarity for a teammate to understand the main modification.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

3-4: Tone misalignment with PR objective.

Line 3 effectively adds creator attribution and credibility. However, line 4's casual phrasing ("trust me bro") contradicts the stated PR objective of adding credibility—informal language undermines rather than reinforces it. Additionally, line 4 is missing end punctuation.

Consider refining line 4 to maintain a more professional tone that aligns with the credibility goal, or relocate the lighter commentary to a different section. If you want to preserve the humor, consider a tone that reads as confidently tongue-in-cheek rather than dismissive.

Optional refinement:

-If you actually read this, this os is amazing trust me bro
+If you actually read this, this OS is amazing. Trust me.

Or, if preserving the casual tone:

-If you actually read this, this os is amazing trust me bro
+If you actually read this, this OS is actually pretty amazing.

Also note: "os" should be capitalized as "OS" for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8061396 and 2affb50.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)