Add JSON recipe literals (rule) #13
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Summary: Now that JSON recipes support including recipes, we need to take those literals into account in downstream reports. Differential Revision: D90605017
|
@dafyddcrosby has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D90605017. |
|
This pull request has been merged in 3e4d967. |
meta-codesync bot
pushed a commit
to facebook/chef-cookbooks
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2026
Summary: X-link: facebook/bookworm#13 Now that JSON recipes support including recipes, we need to take those literals into account in downstream reports. Differential Revision: D90605017 fbshipit-source-id: 38cb6b59576d14a7f88fece3655b75ca99eafddb
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Now that JSON recipes support including recipes, we need to take those
literals into account in downstream reports.
Differential Revision: D90605017