Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR add methods to results objects to check if points (from load combinations) are contained within the strength domain.
The first case is the easiest: we have a given N, we compute the domain (that is a slice in the NMM with a plane orthogonal to N axis).
The second case seems easy. Actually it is trivial for the
theta= 0, so with uniaxial bending about y axes (i.e. a longitudinal section of the 3d NMM domain). But in general whenthetais different than 0 the plane figure is not longitudinal anymore so we have triplet of points N, My, Mz for defining the plane figure domain.