Indexing changes to testpackage #405
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
instead of plot output indexing being based on the function used, i.e plot_bla/BLA/00n_blablabla now it would be based on whether it was restarting/nonrestarting/multipop, i.e the lists in testpackage_definitions. So indexing inside a run could go like plot_bla/BLA/00n_list1_blabla , plot_bla/BLA/00m_list2_blablabla etc. Downside is that within a run we can have two plotfiles starting with same numbering(not same string still) and the upside is that we can now add calls to the end of the list without messing up the indexing for everything.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changed the indexing of the outputted files such that adding a new call to the end of call list defined in testpackage_definitions/testpackage_plot...py will not screw up the indexing compared to previous testpackage runs such that they should still be comparable apart from one new unique file warning from the workflow.