Skip to content

Conversation

@folded
Copy link
Owner

@folded folded commented Dec 27, 2025

  • added top_k_ungapped_local_align and _many variant
  • refactored AlignmentParams to remove redundant length fields
  • added tests for new functionality

- added top_k_ungapped_local_align and _many variant
- refactored AlignmentParams to remove redundant length fields
- added tests for new functionality
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @folded, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the sequence alignment capabilities by introducing functionality to identify the top-k non-overlapping ungapped local alignments. This feature is crucial for applications requiring efficient discovery of multiple high-scoring regions without gaps. The implementation includes a new parameter structure tailored for ungapped alignments and is supported by parallel processing for multiple target sequences, alongside a minor refactoring of existing alignment parameter handling.

Highlights

  • New Feature: Top-K Ungapped Local Alignment: Introduced top_k_ungapped_local_align and top_k_ungapped_local_align_many functions to find the highest-scoring non-overlapping ungapped local alignments (HSPs) between sequences.
  • Refactored Alignment Parameters: The AlignmentParams struct was refactored to remove redundant sa_len and sb_len fields, now deriving sequence lengths directly from the sa and sb vectors.
  • Dedicated Ungapped Alignment Parameters: A new UngappedAlignmentParams struct was added to specifically manage parameters for ungapped alignment calculations, ensuring clarity and separation of concerns.
  • Comprehensive Testing: New test cases were added to validate the functionality of the top_k_ungapped_local_align and top_k_ungapped_local_align_many functions, covering simple cases, overlapping candidates, and the 'k' limit.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces functionality for top-k ungapped local alignment, along with a parallelized _many variant. The changes also include a nice refactoring of AlignmentParams to remove redundant length fields, improving code clarity. The implementation of the new alignment algorithm is solid, using a greedy approach with a binary heap to find high-scoring pairs.

My review focuses on a few areas for improvement:

  • Correctness: Ensuring consistent validation in the parallelized function.
  • Maintainability: Reducing code duplication in the core alignment logic.
  • Determinism: Improving the ordering of candidate alignments for more predictable results.
  • Test Quality: Fixing a minor issue in the new tests.

Overall, this is a great addition to the library. The new functionality is well-implemented and the accompanying tests are thorough.

folded and others added 6 commits December 27, 2025 17:52
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@folded
Copy link
Owner Author

folded commented Dec 27, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a significant new feature: top-k ungapped local alignment, complete with a parallelized _many variant. The implementation in Rust is robust and includes good use of data structures like BinaryHeap for efficiency. The accompanying refactoring of AlignmentParams to remove redundant length fields is a welcome improvement for code clarity and maintainability. The new functionality is also well-covered by unit tests. My review includes a few suggestions to further enhance the Rust implementation by making it more idiomatic, reducing code duplication, and refining a subtle design choice in the alignment sorting logic.

@folded folded merged commit d9836ad into main Dec 27, 2025
4 checks passed
@folded folded deleted the feat/top-k-ungapped branch December 27, 2025 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants