recommended refresh token approach first #15883
Open
+42
−42
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
moving recommended refresh token approach But why do we prefer one vs the other? It's not clear to me on the docs.
bruno-garcia
requested review from
Christinarlong,
GabeVillalobos and
sentaur-athena
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
ajay-sentry
reviewed
Dec 22, 2025
docs/organization/integrations/integration-platform/public-integration.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bruno-garcia
commented
Dec 24, 2025
docs/organization/integrations/integration-platform/public-integration.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
moving recommended refresh token approach
But why do we prefer one vs the other? It's not clear to me on the docs.