Skip to content

Conversation

@regner
Copy link

@regner regner commented Jan 15, 2026

Codeberg has become big enough that it should be included in the default public registries supported by WUD.

Codeberg runs Forgejo and is the main/official deployment of Forgejo. In theory the Forgejo provider could have been used and just supplied the Codeberg URL, but I felt that had two issues:

  • The config for the default registries is no longer consistent
  • The name of the Codeberg registry within the UI would be inconsistent

So while this does add yet another provider, it's just an extension of FOrgejo, which is itself an extension of Gitea. So I think this is ok.

Closes #336

Codeberg has become big enough that it should be included in the default public registries supported by WUD.

Codeberg runs Forgejo and is the main/official deployment of Forgejo. In theory the Forgejo provider could have been used and just supplied the Codeberg URL, but I felt that had two issues:
- The config for the default registries is no longer consistent
- The name of the Codeberg registry within the UI would be inconsistent

So while this does add yet another provider, it's just an extension of FOrgejo, which is itself an extension of Gitea. So I think this is ok.

Closes getwud#336
@regner
Copy link
Author

regner commented Jan 15, 2026

Note that I don't ever do Node development and don't have Node installed so haven't run any tests. I will try and do that later, but it's a fairly straight forward change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Codeberg to standard registries

1 participant