Fix module resolution for gnome-shell

[swsnr]

Use nodenext as module and module resolution options.

I'm not sure why bundler was picked here, but I don't think it's the correct choice for a library which may or may not be bundled. Using nodenext enables stricter module resolution, and in particular enforces the use of file extensions for relative imports, thus avoiding regressions like those fixed in #82

Closes #86

[swsnr]

@JumpLink You switched to Bundler back in 7905340, but the reason isn't exactly clear to me... you don't happen to remember why?

[swsnr]

And a second question, @JumpLink @Totto16 @schnz : while at this I noticed that our example uses esbuild as bundler. Now, I never actually looked at it before, but this comes as a surprise to me, and I'm not quite happy about it:

• Bundling, and by implication, submitting bundled code, is not particularly nice to the ego reviewers.
• It's not even required, as you can just compile every module to a separate JS file with tsc and submit that.

Do any of you remember why the example uses esbuild? Would you mind if I rewrote it to use plain tsc instead of esbuild? That'd be considerably simpler and more straight-forward, and would probably allow us to submit it to gjs.guide to replace most of the current typescript section which isn't ideal either.

[schnz]

Hey Sebastian,

I wasn't involved in any of the hard lifting, i.e. putting together the example app, setting up the build system etc. So I appreciate all the effort you (and the others) put into this!

I can merely say that I agree with your opinion and with the way you want to go. When I rewrote the gTile extension, I also deliberately refrained from using any bundler or build system and resorted to simply and plainly use tsc to transpile TS to JS. Like you said, this not only makes reviewing alot easier, but also makes it easier for new contributors to setup everything.

So, as far as I am concerned: I happily agree with the proposed changes.

[swsnr]

@JumpLink @Totto16 Would someone give me a review? 😇

[Totto16]

@JumpLink @Totto16 Would someone give me a review? 😇

I'll do it as soon I'm home (maybe thats earlier than JumpLink, maybe not 🤷🏼‍♂️ ), 👍🏼

[swsnr]

Thanks 🙏

[swsnr]

@Totto16 @schnz @JumpLink A friendly ping 🙂 😇

[schnz]

Happy to give you more feedback on this if you like. Did I missed something in my previous post?

[swsnr]

@schnz Na, the feedback was perfect, and I don't need more. But I need an approving review 😅 The current branch rules on this repo require one approving review:

[schnz]

🤦‍♂️ - Sorry 'bout that.

[JumpLink]

@swsnr Unfortunately, I'm under a lot of stress at the moment. I'll be out of action for a few weeks until everything has calmed down again. Sorry :(

[swsnr]

No worries, and I'm really sorry for the noise. I'll try not to ping you again. Got my approval after all 😇

Wish you all the best and much success ❤️

[JumpLink]

Thank you! I'm still happy to receive updates on the projects, and I might still have time for small things in between.