Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 6, 2026

Thanks for assigning this issue to me. I'm starting to work on it and will keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Concurrent processor usage for mixing</issue_title>
<issue_description>Especially in a situation where the output is being written directly to stdout, it would be optimal to be able to distribute the load of mathematical operations to multiple processors.

Examine the sample.OutNext() binding:

// OutNext to mix the next sample for all channels, in []float64
func OutNext() []Value {
    return outNextCallback()
}

If we assign some number n to represent the number of concurrent mix processes, then usage of this sample.OutNext() could be batched such that instead of retrieving one sample at a time, the samples are retrieved in a single map-reduce sweep of n goroutines performing the math. Ergo, the final function signature might look more like:

// OutNextConcurrent() to concurrently mix the next samples for all channels, in []float64
func OutNextConcurrent() []Sample {
    // TODO: map-reduce goroutines of n mix-samples
}

</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.

Copilot stopped work on behalf of charneykaye due to an error January 6, 2026 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Concurrent processor usage for mixing

2 participants