Main

[ikamman]

I think it should be that way. With the Param it doesn't make any sense.

[reneleonhardt]

@graniet Could you have a look?
There has no AI review helper like CodeRabbit been enabled yet 😉

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Updates the array item type from ParameterProperty to ParametersSchema, ensuring a unified schema representation.

• Change ParameterProperty.items field to use ParametersSchema
• Update ParamBuilder’s items field and method signature accordingly

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
src/chat/mod.rs	Changed items field type to Option<Box<ParametersSchema>>
src/builder.rs	Updated items field type and items method signature in ParamBuilder

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)

src/chat/mod.rs:93

• The doc comment above items still refers to parameter property, but the field now uses ParametersSchema. Please update the comment to reflect the new schema type (e.g., "defines the schema for array items").

    pub items: Option<Box<ParametersSchema>>,

src/builder.rs:677

• [nitpick] The field name items with type ParametersSchema may be ambiguous; consider renaming to item_schema or items_schema to clarify it holds a schema rather than a property.

    items: Option<Box<ParametersSchema>>,

src/builder.rs:706

• [nitpick] The parameter name schema_property is generic; consider renaming to item_schema to align with the field name and clarify its purpose.

    pub fn items(mut self, schema_property: ParametersSchema) -> Self {

src/builder.rs:706

• There aren't tests covering the new items method with ParametersSchema; adding unit tests to ensure array parameters serialize correctly would improve coverage.

    pub fn items(mut self, schema_property: ParametersSchema) -> Self {