fix(fragmentArguments): arguments on directives for nested fields #4180
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for compassionate-pike-271cb3 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Hi @yaacovCR, I'm @github-actions bot happy to help you with this PR 👋 Supported commandsPlease post this commands in separate comments and only one per comment:
|
JoviDeCroock
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2024
yaacovCR
force-pushed
the
remove-unused
branch
from
db670e9 to
6972be6
Compare
yaacovCR
changed the title
this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test
yaacovCR
force-pushed
the
remove-unused
branch
from
6972be6 to
062232c
Compare
yaacovCR
changed the title
yaacovCR
changed the title
JoviDeCroock
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2024
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
yaacovCR
added a commit
to yaacovCR/graphql-js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2025
…aphql#4180) fixes up just merged graphql#4015 this was actually intended to be in graphql#4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included now we also have a test!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes up just merged #4015
this was actually intended to be in #4015, but due to branch confusion not originally included
now we also have a test!