Skip to content

remove check for acceptableDuration #3735

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
khouadrired wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+3 −9
Open

remove check for acceptableDuration #3735

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-n.tsx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -35,9 +35,7 @@ export const SecurityAnalysisResultN: FunctionComponent<SecurityAnalysisResultNP
limitType: intl.formatMessage({
id: limitViolation?.limitType,
}),
// TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
acceptableDuration:
limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
limitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation?.limitName, intl),
limit: limitViolation?.limit,
value: limitViolation?.value,
Expand Down
8 changes: 2 additions & 6 deletions src/components/results/securityanalysis/security-analysis-result-utils.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,9 +131,7 @@ export const flattenNmKResultsContingencies = (intl: IntlShape, result: Constrai
nextLimitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.nextLimitName, intl),
side: limitViolation.side ? intl.formatMessage({ id: limitViolation.side }) : '',
linkedElementId: contingencyId,
// TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
acceptableDuration:
limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
upcomingAcceptableDuration:
limitViolation?.upcomingAcceptableDuration === MAX_INT32
? null
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -169,9 +167,7 @@ export const flattenNmKResultsConstraints = (intl: IntlShape, result: Contingenc
limitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.limitName, intl),
nextLimitName: translateLimitNameBackToFront(limitViolation.nextLimitName, intl),
side: limitViolation.side ? intl.formatMessage({ id: limitViolation.side }) : '',
// TODO: Remove this check after fixing the acceptableDuration issue on the Powsybl side
acceptableDuration:
limitViolation?.acceptableDuration === MAX_INT32 ? null : limitViolation?.acceptableDuration,
acceptableDuration: limitViolation?.acceptableDuration ?? null,
upcomingAcceptableDuration:
limitViolation?.upcomingAcceptableDuration === MAX_INT32
? null
Expand Down
Loading